LawMirror.com

Results of s 311 criminal procedure code

Showing : 31-40 of 119 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of witnesses - At the instance of prosecutrix and not public prosecutor - Public prosecutor did not raise any objection to the maintainability of application filed by prosecutrix - Court not bound by technicalities to ensure fair trial and to elicit the truth - Technicalities should not stand in the way of determining..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall - of prosecution witnesses - Dismissal of application - Application moved by petitioners after an inordinate delay without mentioning any ground or relevancy of evidence - Allowing application for recalling of prosecution witnesses at such belated stage when evidence of all prosecution witnesses and statement of some..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Expression `essential to just decision of case' used in S.311 Cr.P.C are key words - Court is to form an opinion that for just decision of case recalling or re-examination of witness is necessary...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of Investigating Officer (I.O) - Application dismissed on the ground that I.O. already cross-examined at length by defence - No bona fide has been shown in the application - Only on the ground that witness turned hostile because of pressure upon him, application is moved at fag end of trial - Purpose appears only to..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Production of documents - Three sale deeds and documents of competency to execute these documents i.e. General Power of Attorney and Special Power of Attorney sought to be produced - Trial Court committed error in not appreciating interlinking between these documents - Even though Civil Court has passed a decree in favour of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 228, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 311 -- Framing of charge - Charge u/s 311 IPC - No evidence on record that petitioners forcibly got pregnancy terminated - To frame a charge there has to be some material available with prosecution which is lacking in the case - Investigation done by prosecution itself does not support her claim -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of witness - Application for recall of prosecutrix for re-examination was dismissed - Aspects asserted in application not new facts which require recalling of prosecutrix - Even, said facts have already been taken by accused in his defence - No ground for recalling prosecutrix for re-examination - Application rightly..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of witness - Application moved by prosecutrix for her re-examination was dismissed on the ground that earlier statement given by her was under threat of CBI - Said order was not challenged for 2 years - Order challenged after application by accused u/s 311 Cr.P.C. was dismissed by trial Court - Petition filed by..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of prosecution witnesses - Dismissal of application - It is apparent that petitioner has cross-examined witnesses at length and has put his defence to them - Even, reason given in application for re-examining these witnesses is not bonafide as it appears that petitioner wants to delay the proceedings - Moreover, no..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Summoning of additional witnesses - Witnesses remained silent for one year - Admittedly, for one year there was no such evidence before I.O. or before trial Court that any witness was present at the spot - If this application is allowed then sanctity of first version given by complainant and investigation conducted by I.O. will..........

Showing : 31-40 of 119 Results