LawMirror.com

Results of s 311 of criminal procedure code s

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 101-110 of 411 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Re-examination - Delay in filing application is one of the important factors which has to be explained in the application...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Re-examination - Any Court by exercising its discretionary authority at any stage of inquiry, trial or other proceeding can summon any person as witness or examine any person in attendance though not summoned as a witness or recall or re-examine any person already examined who are expected to be able to throw light upon the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Re-examination - Object of the provision as a whole is to do justice not only from the point of view of the accused and the prosecution but also from the point of view of an orderly society - This power is to be exercised only for strong and valid reasons and it should be exercised with caution and circumspection - Recall is..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Re-examination - PWs seeking re-examination on the ground that previous statements were made under influence of police - Sought after 14 months - Witnesses were cross examined at length - Sessions Judge recorded a finding that they were not under any pressure while recording their evidence - No reasons assigned for delay in..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Application for re-examination of prosecution witness was allowed - Re-examination sought for purpose of clarification with regard to identification of accused - Said application was moved soon after examination of said witness - Therefore, it cannot be said that application is moved to fill up the lacunae of case of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recalling of witness - Previously Legal Aid counsel was engaged and subsequently accused engaged another counsel - Previous counsel was given due opportunity to cross-examine witness and had duly cross-examined - No finding can be recorded that such legal aid counsel appointed by District Legal Services Authority was..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 157, 173(5), 311 -- Summoning of witness - For proving purchase receipt - There is failure of investigating agency to ascertain IMEI number of seized mobile phone during investigation and even, Court failed to ascertain such number prior to handing over custody of seized phone to PW1 - Said failure is not mere irregularity of..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Examination of eye witnesses - Abduction case - Witnesses now sought to be examined were neither examined during investigation nor their names were mentioned in the list of witnesses at the time of presentation of challan - However, said witnesses had seen the accused abducting the victims - In case, witnesses are permitted to..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of witnesses - Two PWs not cross-examined by accused - No attempts to delay the trial were made on behalf of accused - It is also not a case in which multiple opportunities of cross-examination were allowed to go waste and were not availed of - It is thus, expedient and proper to direct that accused should be provided..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recalling of witness - Trial Court recalling witnesses on the ground that no specific question put to witnesses to personally identify each and every accused in dock - However, all accused person were present before Court at the time of examination of witnesses - Moreover, after more than one year of recording of evidence,..........

Showing : 101-110 of 411 Results