LawMirror.com

Results of s 311 of criminal procedure code s

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 121-130 of 411 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Scope - S.311 Cr.P.C. does not empower Court to summon the record of other Court just to ascertain the name of a witness for prosecution...........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of a witness - Witness not cross examined on a certain point - This is very vague ground to seek recall of witness...........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of a witness - Witness examined and cross examined - Order for recall and examination of witnesses cannot be granted on mere asking...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Closure of prosecution evidence by order - Non presence of witness despite service - Trial Court dismissed application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. - Revisional Court allowed application by holding that it was duty of trial Court to secure presence of witness, who had been served but not appeared, through coercive method and thus trial..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138 -- Recall of witness for re-examination - When witness has supported prosecution case in his examination-in-chief and has also been cross-examined at length and he has even denied to specific suggestions put forth by defence counsel..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138 -- Recall of witness for re-examination - Merely because in unguarded moment, witness spoke something in cross-examination which did not suit prosecution, Court should not have exercised its discretion to allow prosecution to..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A -- Production of documents by defence - Case for kidnapping for ransom - Actual source of money for payment of ransom is not relevant matter hence production of document in that regard is not necessary - Regarding other documents, production of the same is not at all necessary for just..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Summoning of witness for further cross examination - Witness already cross examined - Application filed belatedly on the pretext that certain important question not put to witness - Application dismissed...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. - Purpose of S.311 Cr.P.C. is to enable Court to arrive at a just decision of case - Power should be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily - It should be resorted if it is essential to examine such witnesses in order to arrive at a just decision of case - Additional evidence must not be received..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recalling of three PWs for further cross-examination - Witnesses in question were properly examined at length on behalf of accused - Witnesses were not properly cross-examined on point of wearing helmets by assailants cannot be ground for summoning witnesses for further cross-examination - No reason found for summoning PWs for..........

Showing : 121-130 of 411 Results