Showing : 81-90 of 319 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341, 324-- Recovery of axe at the instance of accused - Substantial lacunae found in the prosecution story by trial Court on the basis of which co-accused acquitted - Accused convicted for recovery of axe at his instance - However, recovery of axe not proved from the evidence of attesting witnesses -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 326, 147, 149-- Murder - All the five eye witnesses have named A1 to A7 - Other accused have not been named by PW11 and PW18 - PW10 attributed specific role only to A1 to A7 in assaulting deceased - Conviction of A1 to A7 upheld - However, benefit of doubt given to A10 and A11, as they have not been named by PWs...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 324, 147, 148, 149-- Offence u/ss 323, 324, 147, 148, 149 IPC - Marpeet by both sides admitted - Mere acquittal in cross-case is not determinative that accused of cross-case were not aggressor, as accused need not prove his case beyond all reasonable doubt - Accused had only to show by preponderance of probabilities..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 324, 147, 148, 149-- Offence u/ss 323, 324, 147, 148, 149 IPC - Marpeet by both sides admitted - Both parties sustained injuries - Place of occurrence indicates that it was complainant's side who had gone to the place of occurrence - Preponderance of probabilities is that complainants' side was aggressor and injuries..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 34-- Murder - Common intention - All four accused persons held victim forcibly and two of them inflicted knife blows on his body which consequently resulted in death of victim - As all acted together and shared common intention, corroborated by testimony of eye witnesses - Thus, provisions of ss.302..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 326, 324, 325, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506-- Offence u/ss 326, 324, 325, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 IPC - Modification of sentence - Accused persons inflicted 8 injuries to injured who was about 80 years of age on the date of incident - However, injured did not suffer any serious or permanent injury and is still alive - More so, 9 years have..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 324-- Offence u/s 324 IPC - Non-examination of I.O - Material contradictions were found in the testimony of PWs regarding manner of occurrence or place of occurrence - Non-examination of I.O, in such situation assumes significance as it caused prejudice to defence - PWs stated that due to assault..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 326, 324, 452-- Offence u/ss 326, 324, 452 IPC - Allegation that all accused being members of one family including petitioner attacked complainant with common object by use of sharp edged weapon, lathies etc - Though petitioner also attributed a role in aggression but no specific allegation is made out against..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 324-- Nature of offence - Pistol shots - Found on non vital part of body and injuries simple in nature - Offence u/s 324 IPC made out - Conviction altered from S.307 IPC to S.324 IPC...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341, 324, 147, 149, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Unlawful assembly - Rioting - Test Identification Parade - Out of five accused, only one accused was recognized - No identification parade conducted to identify four assailants, who were not known to complainant and they were not identified when crime was committed - Crucial witness at the scene..........

Showing : 81-90 of 319 Results