Showing : 2081-2090 of 2553 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201 r, w 34-- Child kidnapped and murdered to appease deity on the asking of a Tantrik and causing disappearance of dead body - Appellant 3 was caught red handed by PW 7 while throwing dead body in a pond - Murder by A1, A2 and A4 witnessed by PW 14, an employee of appellant 1 - Trial Court awarding death..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Conviction u/s 302/34 IPC - Appeal against - FIR ante-dated - Material contradictions in statements of eye witnesses - Unnatural conduct on part of these witnesses in not intervening to save their neighbour - FIR written on next day of incident - Weapon recovered but not produced in Court - Blood..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Matrimonial offence - Murder of wife - Conviction of husband and his mother - Case based on circumstantial evidence - Victim sustained 100% burn injuries - Defence plea that it was accidental fire - PW-17, an eight year old child, as he woke up, saw deceased burning in room and both appellants..........
SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376, 34-- Rape - Conviction on basis of sole testimony of prosecutrix - Conviction for the offence of rape can be based on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix if it is reliable, unimpeachable and does not suffer from any infirmity...........
SIKKIM HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376, 34-- Rape - Age - Birth certificate or reliable evidence to prove age of prosecutrix not produced - In ossification test approximate age determined between 14.9 and 15.8 years and doctor stated that six months margin could be allowed as such age of victim girl could be upto 16.3 years - Doctor did not..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 27(B), 27(D), 28(A), 34-- Sleeping partner not in any way actively participating in the conduct of business - No allegation to indicate that at the relevant time sleeping partner was in charge of and responsible to the firm for the conduct of its business - Proceedings against him quashed...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 27(B), 27(D), 28(A), 34-- Sleeping partners - Proceedings ordered to be dropped - No allegation to prima facie indicate that petitioners, partner of firm, were incharge of and responsible to firm for conduct of its business - Both persons ladies and living abroad at relevant time - Proceedings against petitioner lady..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 149, 34-- Common intention - Failure to charge the accused u/s 34, who stood charged u/s 149 IPC - Would not result in any prejudice to them - Accused could be convicted for major offence read with S.34 IPC...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 34, 149, 96-- Free fight - Ss.34 & 149 IPC are inapplicable - Each individual is responsible for his own acts - There is no constructive or vicarious liability for the act of another...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder due to enmity - Head severed from trunk - Head kept in plastic bag and trunk dragged to a pit full of water and thrown in it - Two eye witnesses PW2 and PW5, nephew of deceased - PW1, son of deceased came later and witnessed dragging of his father's trunk - PW2 did not mention name of..........

Showing : 2081-2090 of 2553 Results