Showing : 81-90 of 148 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Proviso (as inserted by Amendment Act 5 of 2009), S.377, 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Right to file - Held, no limitation of time has been provided by Legislature for exercise of such right of appeal by `victim' in terms of said proviso - Hence, in the fact and circumstances of each case,..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Appeal against acquittal by victim - Delay of 725 days - Condonation - Since there is no procedure to inform victim after acquittal or conviction in the case, victim may get information as regards fate of case, after a long lapse of time - Long lapse of time may occur in filing appeal by victim in..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372- - Acquittal - Appeal by victim - Victim of crime can appeal against acquittal - Period of limitation to file appeal is 60 days from date of knowledge of acquittal by victim - Appeal filed thereafter is governed by principles of S.5 of Limitation Act, 1963...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372-- Appeal by victim - Limitation - Period of sixty days should be taken as a reasonable period for preferring an appeal under the provisions of S.372 Proviso Cr.P.C. - Limitation of six months starts to run when victim is informed about acquittal and told about his/her right of appeal - All appeals..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372, 378(4), 190(b)-- Victim - Right to appeal - Held, intention of amendment to S.372 is to provide a right of appeal to `victims' in cases in which accused is charge sheeted on police report u/s.190(b) CrPC, if State Govt. or Central Govt. or District Magistrate does not prefer an appeal against acquittal of person..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 2(wa), 372- - Victim - Held, victim referred to in Statement of Objects and Reasons is victim who is worst sufferers in a crime and do not have much role in Court proceedings and need to be given certain rights and compensation - He is none other than the victims who earlier stood remedy less in a case..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372, 378, 190(a), 200, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Private complaint - Appeal against acquittal - Held, an appeal against acquittal of accused by complainant in a case instituted on a private complaint u/s.190(a) r/w S.200 Cr.P.C. will not lie u/s.372 Cr.P.C. before Sessions Court but lie before High Court with special leave u/s.378(4) Cr.P.C...........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4), 372- - Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Special leave to appeal - Appellant is complainant as well as victim - Availability of efficacious alternative remedy by way of statutory appeal under proviso to S.372 Cr.P.C. before Sessions Court - Held, special leave to prefer an appeal u/s.378(4) Cr.P.C...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372, 2(wa)- - Victim or a complainant in a complaint case - Right of appeal against (i) an order acquitting the accused; (ii) convicting the accused of a lesser offence and (iii) imposing inadequate compensation - Law as to - Summed up - (a) The expression "victim" as defined in S.2(wa) includes all categories..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 372- - Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Appeal by Complainant to High Court - Held, propriety requires that appellant/complainant should have gone to Sessions Court first and only if thereafter, if aggrieved, he should have approached High Court - Appeal returned for presentation before Court of..........

Showing : 81-90 of 148 Results