Showing : 21-30 of 44 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Injunction - Tenant seeking restraint order against landlord from forcibly dispossessing - Plea of landlord of vacating the premises and handing over possession - Possession taken by landlord by breaking open locks and tenant lodged a police complaint for committing the offence of criminal..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Injunction - Property such as trees grown on land can be shown in possession only by evidence relating to title or manner of enjoyment of trees themselves - If plaintiff was contending that trees were in his enjoyment and defendant was attempting to cut and remove the trees, trial Court was..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38, 39-- Prohibitory and mandatory injunction - User of vacant plot for sake of convenience - Easementary right is not created over the vacant portion - Plaintiff not entitled to injunction...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Suit for permanent injunction - Plaintiff dispossessed during pendency of suit - Plaintiff amended plaint seeking relief of mandatory injunction - Held, decree of possession in a suit for injunction can be granted...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38, 39-..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 1, 2, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38, 39-- Practice and procedure - Injunction - Grant of - Clarity in pleadings - Held, it is one of fundamental principles of jurisprudence that litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings and especially when it contains a prayer for injunction - A prayer for injunction, which is an..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 54, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Sale - Some amount of consideration remained unpaid - Sale does not become invalid - Property sold stands transferred to the buyer subject to the statutory charge for the unpaid part of the sale price...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Injunction - Rights of parties to perform `Puja' in a temple - Right to perform `Puja' is intangible right, yet it is a property right as priests and Pandits traditionally make a living out of performance of `Puja' - Therefore, `property right' in performance of `Puja' are certainly there and an..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Injunction - Ordinarily if the suit property is in possession with a person for a sufficiently long time then injunction should not disturb that possession - However, a person in possession can resist the entire world but not the true owner, even if the true owner is not in actual possession of..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Injunction - Rights of parties to perform `Puja' in a temple - In case plaintiff is the true owner of the property then he can claim permanent injunction even against the defendants, even if he was not performing the `Puja' at the relevant time...........

Showing : 21-30 of 44 Results