Showing : 11-20 of 119 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39-- Agreement to sell - Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction - Bar of limitation - Agreement in question executed in 1980 - Whereas, suit filed in 1992 - There is nothing to show that agreement was to be kept alive for such a long time - Moreover, agreement itself is not proved, therefore, no..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39, 38-- Revocation of licence - Suit for mandatory injunction and in the alternative for possession and for permanent injunction restraining appellant from applying for an electric connection to the Electricity Department in his name - Parties to the suit are closely related and record reveals that in..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39-- Mandatory injunction - Removal of wall and to keep service lane open as an approach way - Defendant specifically pleaded that wall was constructed on the basis of permission granted by defendant no.2 vide sanction order - Said sanction order not denied by plaintiff - However, there is admittedly..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Suit mandatory and permanent injunction - Directing defendant to close main gate, which had been opened illegally, causing obstruction in usage and occupation of plaintiff - Defendant purchased his house and got it repaired after getting site plan sanctioned from M.C. - As per sanctioned site plan..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39-- Mandatory injunction - Unauthorised construction - Not proved with description on the land where it stood - Mandatory injunction, rightly, declined...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39-- Mandatory injunction - Both parties agreed to leave passage of 5 feet each from their land and in this way total width of passage will be 10 feet - As per case of plaintiff he had left 8 feet wide passage from his land - Plaintiff failed to prove this fact and also that defendant encroached upon..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Permanent prohibitory injunction - Restraining defendant from interfering in exclusive possession of plaintiff over suit land or from raising construction - Plaintiff himself admitted that defendant had laid foundation of shop in question prior to institution of suit with his consent - Defendant..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39-- Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction - Auction - Highest bid - Bid never accepted by concerned authorities - There was no concluded contract - Merely on the granting the declaration that rejection was illegal and arbitrary and by incompetent authority, further relief of mandatory..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Suit for demarcation, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction - Plaintiff has no right in suit property - Defendant is owner of property purchased from plaintiff`s sister - Relief of demarcation, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction not granted to plaintiff - Suit dismissed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39-- Suit for permanent and mandatory injunction - Without seeking relief of possession - Suit is maintainable, where defendants illegally constructed the structure on suit property, as relief of demolishing the illegal structure in substance was for possession of property...........

Showing : 11-20 of 119 Results