Showing : 331-340 of 654 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2, 7, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ejectment order - Appeal against - Dismissal in default - On application for restoration of appeal, matter remanded which is pending disposal for the last 25 years - Petitioner prayed that appeal be decided on merit after condoning delay - Delay condoned in view of observations made by the Apex..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay is just one of the ingredients which has to be considered - Court must also take into consideration the conduct of the parties, bona fide reasons for condonation of delay and whether such delay could easily be avoided by the applicant acting with normal care and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Onus to show that sufficient cause exists for condonation of delay lis upon the applicant...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Death during pendency of appeal - Delay of 778 days in impleading L.R's - Condonation of delay - Applicants not aware of the pendency of appeal - Applicants totally callous about pursuing appeal - They acted irresponsible and even with negligence - Not approached Court with..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- L.R's - Impleading of L.R's - Non impleadment - Abatement - Setting aside abatement - S.5 Limitation Act applies to an application filed U.O.22.R.9 CPC - An application for setting aside abatement has to be treated at par and the principles enunciated for condonation of delay under Section 5 of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9-- Delay - Condonation - Sufficient cause - To be construed liberally so as to advance substantial justice, when the delay is not on account any dilatory tactics, want of bona fides, deliberate inaction or negligence on the part of the appellant; (ii) In considering the reasons for condonation of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - There is no straight jacket formula to come to the conclusion of sufficient and good grounds - Each case has to be weighed from its facts and the circumstances in which the party acts and behaves...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Unless malafides are writ large on the conduct of the party, generally as a normal rule, delay should be condoned - In the legal arena, an attempt should always be made to allow the matter to be contested on merits rather than to throw it on such technalities...........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 24A, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal condonation of delay - Delay of 281 days in filing the appeal - Only reason given that due to some unavoidable reasons the appeal was filed with delay - Not a sufficient cause when the Counsel for the appellants was present before the District Forum when the impugned order was passed -..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Impleading of L.R's - Delay - Condonation - Non impleadment of L.R's for more than one year inspite of knowledge of death of respondents - Reason stated to be busy in filing SLP's in Supreme Court because of time bound cases - Held, it is not sufficient reason in law for condonation of delay - No..........

Showing : 331-340 of 654 Results