Showing : 41-50 of 104 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Delay - Non appearance of Advocate, his failure to communicate that defendant is proceeded against ex parte and defendant's lack of knowledge of ex parte judgment - Can be treated as sufficient cause for condoning the delay and setting aside the ex parte decree...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Cause shown for not approaching Court within limitation that petitioner was not physically fit and remained in hospital for some day - Held, cause shown is not sufficient as it was not necessary for the petitioner to come to Court personally...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), S.96 - Delay in filing first appeal by Govt. - Condonation - Court has discretion to condone delay provided sufficient cause is shown - Government organization has its own administrative limitation with regard to movement of files - Necessary procedure as required under..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Wrong advice by counsel - Ignorance of law on the part of counsel - Mistake of counsel or ignorance of law on the part of counsel cannot be treated as sufficient cause for condoning the delay...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Divorce - Exparte decree - Setting aside of - Condonation of delay - No knowledge of ex parte decree, held, to be sufficient cause for condonation of delay - Decree set aside...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of 12 days in filing appeal - Mistake of counsel - Counsel was under impression that he has filed application for certified copies of judgment and decree but application was not filed - Delay on account of mistake of counsel which cannot be attributed to the applicants - Sufficient cause to..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Delay of three years - Condonation of delay - Mistake of clerk of counsel as he could not mark the case and counsel could not appear and case was dismissed for want of prosecution - Factum of dismissal came into notice of applicant on inspection of file..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Bringing legal heirs on record - Condonation of delay - Averments contained in application ex-facie lack bona fide - Petitioners have failed to explain delay by showing sufficient cause - Held, it is true that approach of Courts should be liberal so far as applications filed u/s 5 of Limitation..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 22, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal - Cross objections - Not filed within time - Condonation of delay - Court normally be inclined to condone the delay in the interest of justice unless and until the cross objector is unable to furnish a reasonable or sufficient cause for seeking leave of Court to file cross objections beyond..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of 894 days - Condonation - Reason or cause stated about the illness and old age and also the fact that advocate had also expired resulting in a communication gap - Held, it is sufficient cause - Delay condoned...........

Showing : 41-50 of 104 Results