Showing : 101-110 of 308 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Contraband - Search - Provision of S.50 of the Act applies only where the search is of a 'person' of accused...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Poppy husk - Recovery of - Search - Option of - Accused not informed about his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate - Offer given as to `Gazetted Police Officer' - This is partial offer - It amounts to flagrant violation of the mandatory provision of S.50 of the Act -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Opium - Recovery from dicky of scooter - Provision of S.50 of the Act is required to be complied with even if the recovery was effected from the scooter...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Search - Two accused - Both the accused were inquired jointly as to whether they want to be searched in presence of a Gazetted Police Officer or a Magistrate - Held, this is a partial offer which is violative of the mandatory provision of S.50 of the Act...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18, 50-- Recovery of three kg. of opium from dicky of scooter - One accused was driving the scooter and other was pillion rider - Sample was sent to CFSL after sixteen days - No explanation for delay - Violation of provisions of S.50 of the Act as offer of search was made jointly to both the accused - No..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Partial offer - Appellant was informed that he can be searched in presence of DSP or Magistrate - Held, that it was duty of the IO to explain the appellant that he had option to be searched in the presence of a gazetted office or a Magistrate - Held, that there was violation of S.50 of the Act...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Heroine - Recovery of 5 Kgs. from a gag in possession of appellant - S.50 of the Act has no application - S.50 of the Act applies only when contraband is recovered from personal search of accused...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Opium - Recovery of 4 kg. from a car driven by accused - Person of accused also searched but no recovery effected - Provision of S.50 not complied with - In case of recovery from a vehicle, if person of accused is also searched then S.50 of the Act is to be complied with - Accused acquitted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50, 13-- Poppy husk - Recovery of 40 bags from a truck - Recovery effected between sun set and sun rise - Accused opted to be searched in presence of Gazetted officer - DSP called for search - No reason given for calling Police Officer - Nothing on record to show that accused was ready to get his person..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50, 13-- Poppy husk - Recovery of 40 bags from a truck - 30 bags produced in Court - Prosecution version that 10 bags were damaged in flood not believed - Sample sent to FSL after 16 days of recovery - No cogent reason for the delay - No intimation sent to Superior Police Officer immediately thus violating..........

Showing : 101-110 of 308 Results