Showing : 31-40 of 75 Results

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91-- Statement made by prosecutrix at earlier point of time before police - Production of - Power of trial Court - Held, there is no embargo for Court to summon documents and statement made before police by prosecutrix, at earlier point of time, if Court trying the case considers that production of..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91-- Statement made by prosecutrix at earlier point of time before police - Application for production of - Rejection - Validity - While rejecting application filed on behalf of accused-petitioners, no proper reasons are assigned by trial Court to conclude as to how documents to be called for are..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91-- Dishonour of cheque - Production of document - Requirement - Held, the first and foremost requirement of S.91 Cr.P.C. is about the document being necessary or desirable for the purpose of trial of the case u/s.138 of NI Act - No roving enquiry can be allowed to be undertaken into the matter by..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 91(1), (2)-- Public street - S.91(1) CPC confer an additional right and locus standi on two or more persons to file suit relating to public street with leave of Court - It does not bar the right of any person to file suit independently of this provision...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 91(2)-- Public street - Encroachment - Plaintiff in view of the sale deed executed in his favour by defendant No.1 making provision for the disputed street has independent personal right to file suit to seek protection of disputed street from encroachment by defendants - Consequently, suit cannot be said..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91-- Production of document - Court has power to require any person in whose possession any document is believed to be, which is required for trial of the case, to attend and produce such document, but the Section nowhere empowers the Court to compel an accused to produce any evidence against him...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340-- Defence witnesses - After thorough scrutiny defence witnesses found to be truthful witnesses - On the other hand contradictions occurred in the prosecution witnesses - Held, more reliance is to be placed upon the evidence produced in the defence in preference to the evidence produced by the..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340-- Defence witnesses - Appreciation of evidence - Witnesses examined by accused in defence command the same respect as the witnesses examined by the prosecution and the same rule of evidence regarding scrutiny applies to both the set of witnesses...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340-- Summons for production of documents - SP Vigilance conducting investigation - Summons for production of documents issued by ASI - It is SP Vigilance who is competent to issue summons for production of documents - If he had authorized ASI complainant to issue summons on his behalf, then he could..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340-- Presence of witness at the time of raid - Name of every person who enters the office of Vigilance Bureau is required to be recorded in the DDR - No such entry made regarding one Subhash Chander Gupta, SDO - Explanation offered that entry regarding gazetted officer is not required to be made - No..........

Showing : 31-40 of 75 Results