Showing : 1-10 of 18 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Agreement to sell-- Specific performance - Readiness and willingness - Financial capacity of buyer - Proof of cheque is not proof of availability of amounts in bank account in absence of copy of bank account, which would have shown necessary funds for encashment of cheque - Self serving statement that plaintiff had..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Self cheque - Word `or bearer' not scored off - It is thus a bearer cheque - Possessor of such a cheque for consideration can be termed as a holder in due course...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 145-- Dishonour of cheque - Evidence on affidavit - Non-obstante clause in S.145(1) of Act is self explanatory and over-rules the requirement of examination of complainant on solemn affirmation u/s 200 Cr.P.C. - Cognizance of complaint, therefore, can be taken without complying the mandate of S.200..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Holder in due course - Self drawn account payee cheque - Held, complainant Bank is not the holder in due course in the absence of any mandate in favour of complainant bank to credit the amount of said cheque for clearing the outstandings in the loan account - Proceedings..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Conviction - Validity - Established on record that complainant/respondent had received bearer cheque for consideration in discharge of legal liability and was holder in due course of same - Dishonour of cheque was for reason that account of petitioner/accused did not carry..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Appeal against acquittal - Complaint u/s 138 of the Act - No evidence except self-serving evidence of accused/respondent - Even, if cheque leaves were misused, duty cast upon accused to inform banker to stop payment, against such cheques which were lost or..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d)-- Insurance policy - Consumer - Premium payment - Non issuance of receipt - Liability of principal for the acts of agent - Agent collected Cheque for premium and got it encashed but did not deposit the premium amount with the appellants and no receipt for deposit of premium issued - Plea of the..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 21-- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Complaint against director of company - Annual return produced showing details of share-holding of petitioner as director of company - Other share-holders having only nominal shares - Quashing of complaint sought on basis of annual returns to show that petitioner..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Self drawn cheque - Word `bearer' not deleted - Complainant in possession of cheque is obviously the holder of the cheque in due course - Complainant is entitled to initiate the proceedings - No illegality in summoning order...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Self drawn cheque endorsed in favour of complainant - Cheque dishonoured - Drawer of cheque is guilty of offence u/s 138 of the Act - Possessor of a self drawn cheque comes within the definition of `Holder in due course'...........

Showing : 1-10 of 18 Results