Showing : 2361-2370 of 4411 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 2(1)(r)-- Airlines - Unfair trade practice - Defective seat - Not having reclining facility - Foot rest did not work and seat belts got struck not retrieved - Complainant a senior citizen aged 72 years travelled without safety belt in non reclining seat - Malfunctioning of seat within the knowledge of OP -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 279, 304A-- Appellant a head constable entrusted with delivering wireless message - He drove vehicle negligently causing fatal accident - Accused convicted for offences under Ss.279, 304-A IPC - Accused faced agony of trial for 20 years - He had a good career throughout and was dismissed from service on..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197-- Offence u/s 13(1)(d) r/w S.13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act and u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC - Challan presented after retirement - Sanction for prosecution refused twice when accused were in service - Sanction for prosecution under IPC is required even after retirement - As far as..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Housing-- Commercial booth - Resumption of booth - Deficiency in service - Categorical stand of appellants that basic facilities had been provided - There is no rebuttal from the side of respondent No.1 - Respondent No.1 not entitled to withhold the balance 75% of the amount which he was required to pay in..........
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g)-- Pricing - Water charges - Enhancement of tax by Municipality - Held that pricing of any nature is the job of the executive - It cannot be challenged in the Consumer Fora alleging that it is deficiency in service on the part of the service provider...........
UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUCKNOW
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Plot allotment-- Non execution of sale deed or handing overof possession despite deposit of entire cost and other charges - Direction by District Forum for refund of amount with interest @ 10% p.a. - Held to be a case of deficiency in service on the part of appellant - The rate of interest @ 10% p.a. held to be on..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) , 14(1)(d)-- Consumer - Education - Hostel accommodation - Electrocution - Death of girl student - No allegation against the College authorities in the complaint - The complaint does not state how the complainants seek to establish the relationship of 'consumer' and the College as a 'service provider' once the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 20-- Partition case filed before Tehsildar - Case decided ex parte against petitioner - Ex parte order confirmed in appeal as well in revision - Petitioner impugned order rendered in appeal as well as in revision by way of writ petition - It was not the case set up by petitioner that procedure as..........
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Medical negligence-- Blood report - Report of blood by OP hospital that the Complainant was HIV positive - Second blood report from another hospital showed HIV negative - OP hospital issued wrong report - Complainant held entitled for compensation of Rs. 25,000/ - for deficiency in service on the part of OP hospital...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 311-- Doctrine of proportionality - Habitual absentee - Removal from service - If decision of employer is found to be within legal parameters, jurisdiction will not be invoked when misconduct stands proved - Courts will not ordinarily interfere with quantum of punishment imposed upon delinquent..........

Showing : 2361-2370 of 4411 Results