Showing : 31-40 of 111 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Ex parte decree not to be set aside on an assumed irregularity in service of summons if defendant had notice of date of hearing and had sufficient time to appear and answer the plaintiff's claim...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 80-- Notice - Service of notice u/s 80 CPC after institution of suit - Basic defect is not cured - Dismissal of suit - No interference...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 17, 19-- Service of summons - Validity - Serving officer sought to serve summon of suit on defendant - Defendant not available - Since defendant was not available, therefore, his wife who was residing with him, was sought to be served with notice but she refused to accept notice - Thereafter, copy of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13- - Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Second Proviso is mandatory in nature - Court not to set aside decree on mere irregularity in service of summons or in case, where defendant had notice of the date as sufficient time was there to appear in the Court - Court not to allow the application in utter..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 20-- Dismissal of suit - Non-service of summons - Order dismissing suit U.O.9.R.2 of CPC for not taking steps to furnish correct address of 1st defendant - 1st defendant was reported to have gone abroad and not residing at the address where summons had been taken - Notice was given to his father who..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - Four defendant - Two served with notice - Injunction application not to be decided finally before service of notice to the remaining defendants - Courts below committed a patent error in passing the impugned order as against the defendants not served with notice for..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Summons sent through registered post only and not through the process serving agency - Plea that it is not service in terms of procedure provided in CPC - Held, merely because the notice had not been served through process of Court will not be material as the..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 41, Rule 1-- Recovery of arrears of rent - Suit land was given on a monthly rent of Rs. 10,215/- to appellant No.2 by respondent/ plaintiff - After obtaining possession of suit land and getting super structure raised, appellant No.2 has not paid any amount as rent to respondent/plaintiff as per agreement -..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 80-- Notice - Public Limited company an instrumentality of State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India - Officers of the Company not directly in the service or pay of the Government or remunerated by fees or commission for the performance of thier duties - Held, notice as contemplated u/s 80..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 80-- Bihar State Electricity Board - Notice - Held, neither Bihar State Electricity Board would be `Government' nor would its officers would be considered as `Public Officers' for purpose of S.80 CPC - Service of notice upon defendants was not required - Therefore, even if no notice has been served u/s..........

Showing : 31-40 of 111 Results