LawMirror.com

Results of services case

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 81-90 of 178 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume II, Rule 2 2(b) -- Criminal proceedings - Retiral benefits - Withholding of - Under Rule 2.2 (b) of the Rules - Criminal proceedings were initiated against the petitioner while he was in service - Offences unrelated to the service of the petitioner - Neither there is any claim of causing loss to the Government nor there is any case for..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Haryana Civil Services Rules, Volume II, Rule 2.2(b) -- Departmental proceedings - After the superannuation - Limitation - Projected loss during the period 22.12.1998 to 30.12.1998 - Charge sheet issued on 31.12.2002 - The losses would be beyond the period of four years and to that extent Rule 2.2(b) of the Rules would get attracted - Impugned order passed therefore..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)(ii) -- Consumer - Medical service - Contention by OP I that medical services given by him were without any consideration and free of charge as such complainant cannot be regarded as consumers of the answering OP within meaning of Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of CP Act - Complaint claimed that at the time of admission of patient a sum..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)(ii) -- Consumer - Medical service - Contention by OP I that medical services given by him were without any consideration and free of charge as such complainant cannot be regarded as consumers of the answering OP within meaning of Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of CP Act - Complaint claimed that at the time of admission of patient a sum..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 22(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 32, Rule 7 -- Settlement of motor accident claim case through Lok Adalat - Minors figure in array of parties - Where minors figure in the array of parties, guardians shall expressly declare that the compromise settlement is for the benefit of minors - Lok Adalat cannot allow compromise..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, Section 68, 69 -- Punishment order - Stoppage of increments - Review - Termination - Jurisdiction - Order passed by the competent authority i.e. the Managing Committee imposing punishment of stoppage of two increments - Revision/Appeal dismissed by the competent authority and order attained finality - Reopening of case by..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Motor car - Purchase by firm for use of Managing partner for his going and coming to his place of work and home and it is for his use for activity of the firm - Plea by OP that car was sold by them to the complainant who is a commercial company and it has been used for a commercial purpose..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Motor car - Purchase by firm for use of Managing partner for his going and coming to his place of work and home and it is for his use for activity of the firm - Plea by OP that car was sold by them to the complainant who is a commercial company and it has been used for a commercial purpose..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Medical negligence -- Expert opinion - Surgery - For large posterior cervical fibromyomata - Appellant - doctor had taken all due and proper precautions preoperatively and post - operatively - He had conducted operation after patient was subjected to thorough clinical tests and sonography and they had come to the conclusion respondent was requiring surgery - Appellant told..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Medical negligence -- Expert opinion - Surgery - For large posterior cervical fibromyomata - Appellant - doctor had taken all due and proper precautions preoperatively and post - operatively - He had conducted operation after patient was subjected to thorough clinical tests and sonography and they had come to the conclusion respondent was requiring surgery - Appellant told..........

Showing : 81-90 of 178 Results