Showing : 91-100 of 103 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 7-- before amendment by Punjab Act 19 of 1976-Did not debar the Assistant Collector to determine the question whether the land in dispute falls within the definition of Shamlat Deh or not and whether it vests in Gram Panchayat or not-Statute then prevalent did not oust jurisdiction of Civil Court to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 4, 2(g)-- East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, Sections 18, 23-A and 2(bb)-Bachat land mutated in the name of Gram Panchayat and later on incorporated in Jamabandi-Not Shamlat Deh-Does not vest Bachat land in Gram Panchayat-Bachat land is ownership of proprietors of the..........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(iia), 3- - Allotments/transfers of Shamlat Deh made before cut off date i.e. July 9, 1985 (date of pronouncement of orders by Supreme Court in Gram Panchayat Jamalpur's case 1985 PLJ 463) - Saved and regularised - All rights, title and interest of Panchayats in evacuees share in Shamlat Deh as from..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - Suit for permanent injunction - Neither of the parties owner of the land in dispute - Land recorded to be in the ownership of Shamlat Deh - Plaintiff in cultivating possession of the land in dispute - Plaintiff entitled to injunction prayed for...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1986
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7(2)-- As in Haryana State - Mutation which forms foundation of revenue record and by virtue of which land mutated in name of Gram Panchayat set aside by High Court- Land cannot be held to be in ownership of Panchayat on the basis of such mutation in proceedings under Section 7(2) - Question whether land..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1986
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 3(1), 2(g)(5)(vi), 2(h)-- Section 3(1) has given retrospective effect to definition of Shamlat Deh as contained in Section 2(g)-Absence of any finding that possession of Biswadar or proprietor in revenue estate was prior to January 9, 1954 - Land falls within definition of Shamlat Deh...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1983
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 13- - Civil Court decree not final and matter still pending in appeal - Question whether land is or is not shamlat deh - Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate upon the question - Decree passed by Civil Court before enforcement of substituted Section 13 by Act 2 of 1981 - Does not..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1978
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(5), 4, 5-- By plantation of trees reduction in land for grazing cattle (described in revenue records as charand) - Shamlat deh vested in Panchayat - Charand land would also be considered to have been vested - Grazing rights in shamilat tend - Not at all saved for any residents - Not necessary that what was..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1977
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(1), 2(g)(5)-- Sub-clause (5) not a proviso to sub-clause (() - Ail sub-clauses of Section 2(g) independent of each other - Do not govern or circumscribe scope of each other in any manner - Sub-clause (I) covers Lands described in revenue records as shamlat deh - Sub-clause (5) covers lands described as banjar..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1976
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(3), 2(g)(5)-- Relative scope of - Any land described as Banjar Qadim and falling in Shamlat Taraf or Shamlat Patti according to revenue record - Governed by sub-clause (5) and not sub-clause (3) - Sub-clause (3) is a general clause and includes in its ambit lands of all qualities whether Banjar Qadim, Banjar..........

Showing : 91-100 of 103 Results