Showing : 71-80 of 119 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 23-- Land acquisition - Compensation - Value of land - Land owners relied on certain sale deeds showing better price - Land owners has not referred to any site plan on record to show exact location of the acquired land and land dealt with in the sale deeds relied upon - Sale deeds of no aid in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 401-- Revision against conviction - High Court while exercising revisional jurisdiction is not to reevaluate and reappreciate the evidence of prosecution unless it comes to the conclusion that findings recorded are illegal, perverse or erroneous on account of misreading of evidence - In the instant case..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Haryana Municipalities Act, 1973, Section 3, Haryana Municipalities Act, 1973, Section 205, 208-- Application for sanction of building plan not submitted in form prescribed u/s 3 of the Act - It cannot be taken as a valid application - Rejection of this application - Municipal Committee not supposed to convey decision within 60 days - Site plan would not be deemed to be sanctioned under..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Haryana Municipalities Act, 1973, Section 205, 208-- Application for sanction of site plan not submitted in form prescribed under the Act and Bye Laws - Municipal Committee rejected application as invalid - Rejection conveyed to respondent - Another application submitted by respondent - No decision conveyed by M.C. within 60 days - Application shall..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Haryana Municipal Act, 1973, Section 205-- Plaintiff submitted site plan to MC for construction of building and deposited necessary fee - Sanction or refusal not communicated despite lapse of more than one year - Held, u/s 205 of Act of 1973 site plan would be deemed to be sanctioned if sanction or refusal not communicated within 60 days -..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Housing-- Construction of house stopped by petitioners twice though site plan was approved by it and there was no fault on the part of respondent - complainant - The construction delayed for over one year - Award of an amount of Rs. 1,13,476/ - by the District Forum based on evidence on record which..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY , CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g)-- Extension fee - For not completing building - Building plan submitted by respondent on 2.5.1997 - After three four months minor objections raised thrice which were removed by respondent and the same submitted on 26.10.1998 - Building plan not sanctioned despite removal of objections - Appellant..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, 227-- Public notice for auction of Photostat site - Notice challenged on the plea that site in Mini Secretariat is unauthorized and does not find mention in original lay out plan - Petitioner himself running his photostat machine and Form counter from the same site - Held, step taken by administration..........
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Housing-- Delay in construction - Escalation cost - Compensation - The delay had been caused due to own negligence of the complainant letting the sanction of the site plan lapse - No evidence produced by the complainant to justify the claim amounting to Rs. 1,50,000 - Order of the District Forum declining..........
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 13(1)(d)-- Housing - Residential plot - Non providing of amenities - Site plan was not got approved as zoning plan had not been approved - Award of compensation of Rs. 20,000 as compensation per year held to be without any basis - Complainant given compensation by way of interest @ 18% p.a. on the amount..........

Showing : 71-80 of 119 Results