Showing : 1-8 of 8 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Evidence of tracking by sniffer dog is weakest piece of evidence...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 392, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder of teenager girl - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Tracking dog squad - Scientific evidence in the form of sniffer dogs squad hinted indulgence of both the accused, though got little relevance but in view of other evidence on record, it adds positivity to prosecution case...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Sniffer dog - Identification by sniffer dog - Contention that identification of accused by sniffer dog cannot be relied upon as it is not admissible in order to prove guilt of appellant - Services of sniffer dog taken for investigation - Said dog traced accused and he was formally arrested..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Sniffer dog-- Police dog traced the scent from the place of incident to the house of accused - It is no evidence in the eye of law...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Sniffer dog-- Evidentiary value - There are chances of error on the part of the dog or its master - Possibility of a misrepresentation or a wrong inference from the behaviour of the dog could not be ruled out - From the scientific point, there is little knowledge or much uncertainty as to precise faculties..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Sniffer dog - Services of a sniffer dog may be taken for the purpose of investigation, its faculties cannot be taken as evidence for the purpose of establishing the guilt of an accused...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Sniffer dog-- Dog after smelling dead body and materials at the scene of offence moved to the house of accused No.1 and scratched the ground and barked and thereafter it went to the house of accused No.2 and stopped near the door of the house and scratched - Evidence is not sufficient to show that there was any..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Sniffer dog-- No article belonging to the accused found near the dead body - It is improbable for sniffer dog to catch the smell of accused and track them down...........

Showing : 1-8 of 8 Results