LawMirror.com

Results of specific relief act declaration

Showing : 91-100 of 412 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 13, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Bar to jurisdiction - Admittedly, plaintiffs have no documents of ownership of land as land falls within Lal Dora of village - However, Gram Panchayat was able to prove that land was Shamlat Deh vesting in Gram..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Second appeal - Substantial question of law - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Proof of title - As per plaintiffs, once they have claimed that property was within Lal Dora of village it was duty of Court to frame issue and decide the same - However, duty of Court is to..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration, separate possession and permanent injunction - Suit property claimed to be joint property by plaintiff - However, after examining mutation and jamabandis, Court recorded a finding that there were certain entries in mutation from where it is evident that portion of suit property was self acquired of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Agricultural land - Plaintiff claims to be owner of suit property on the basis of oral partition which took place between ancestors of parties - Defendants admitted said oral partition in family and its implementation - However, defendants failed to prove their ownership over suit..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration of title, injunction and possession - Entire case of plaintiffs based on ground that they are owner of suit property - Burden is upon plaintiffs to prove as to under what basis they have acquired their right, title and interest over suit properties - However, plaintiffs failed to produce any documents or..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39 -- Agreement to sell - Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction - Suit filed almost after 12 years from the date of agreement - Suit not filed for specific performance - It is a misconceived suit - Suit was rightly dismissed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39 -- Agreement to sell - Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction - Agreement to sell not proved on record - Plaintiff thus, have no prima facie case in his favour to file a suit in relation to suit land once agreement was held not proved - Suit dismissed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39 -- Agreement to sell - Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction - Bar of limitation - Agreement in question executed in 1980 - Whereas, suit filed in 1992 - There is nothing to show that agreement was to be kept alive for such a long time - Moreover, agreement itself is not proved, therefore, no suit for claiming any relief in..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of occupancy rights - Plaintiff/claimant obtained occupancy rights on basis of lease deed - Lease deed being unregistered and ante-dated found to be sham - Even otherwise, plaintiff himself admitted that he is not in possession of land and cultivation on his behalf is carried out by servant under management of..........

MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Tenant filed suit on the apprehension that landlord attempting to deny his right as a tenant and was threatening to dispossess him without following due process of law - However, subsequently landlord filed suit for eviction - Neither apprehension of tenant is survived nor he now..........

Showing : 91-100 of 412 Results