Showing : 121-130 of 369 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38-- Suit for declaration and perpetual injunction - Ancestral property - Plaintiff born before date of vesting, so he got share equivalent to defendant No.1 in the property of Sir and khudkasht along with his father/defendant No.1 - However, name of father recorded in revenue record as `Karta' of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 14, 34-- Contract of personal service - Cannot be specifically enforced - Termination of service of an employee by a private company, at best, gives right to aggrieved employee to sue for compensation in money - Suit for declaration that termination is illegal is not maintainable...........
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Declaration of title - Payment of land revenue to Govt. - Does not create any right or title or interest in immovable property - At best, those documents would establish that land revenue was paid to revenue department for the property owned or possessed - Those documents do not confer any title..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Suit for declaration on the basis of adverse possession - Suit is not maintainable...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38-- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction on the basis of adverse possession - Suit for declaration on the basis of adverse possession is not maintainable - Plaintiff, since established his possession, decree of permanent injunction rightly granted in his favour...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Mohammedan Law-- Inheritance - Joint possession - Suit for declaration - Plaintiff being daughter of deceased entitled to equal share as compared to her brothers, as per Hanafi Succession - No evidence produced by defendants brothers of plaintiff, that they are in possession of property in a clear ouster of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38, 39-- Suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction - Ex parte evidence - Defendants not contested the suit and proceeded ex parte - Plaintiff by way of his ex parte evidence proved its case that she along with defendant Nos.1 and 3 purchased the property and verbal settlement arrived at..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, Land Acquisition Act, 1894-- Suit for declaration of title - Once title of respondent No.3 was firmly established, appellants were duty bound to rebut these evidences and establish their title and possession - Appellants failed to lead any evidence as to their title - Concurrent findings of Special Tribunal and Special Court..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, Land Acquisition Act, 1894-- Suit for declaration of title - Procedural irregularity - Plea of no, compliance of procedure having no effect on merits of case and is of no consequence in facts and circumstance of the case - Since appellants failed to implead themselves before Special Court even when fact of pendency of case..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Suit for declaration - Plaintiff claiming only successor-i, interest of suit property left by Transgender/deceased - She being transgender proved that deceased was her chela - Suit property would thus devolve upon plaintiff on the basis of Guru-chela custom - Suit decreed in favour of plaintiff...........

Showing : 121-130 of 369 Results