Showing : 31-40 of 106 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35, Registration Act, 1908, Section 17, 49-- Unstamped instrument - Not admissible in evidence even for collateral purpose, until the same is impounded...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 33, 35-- Stamp duty - Documents executed in Delhi - Stamp duty is payable as applicable in Delhi...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4, Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35-- Deficient stamp duty - Objection as to deficient stamp duty and admissibility of document has to be decided at the stage of evidence of plaintiff - Such objection cannot be deferred to be decided at the stage of final hearing...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91-- Insufficiently stamped document - S.35 of Stamp Act r/w S.91 of Evidence Act excludes both the original instrument and secondary evidence of its contents if it is unstamped or insufficiently stamped - As document itself and secondary evidence of its contents being as inadmissible, no other..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35-- `Duly stamped' - Means stamped in accordance with the law in force when such instrument is executed or first executed - S.35 of Act thus prohibits admission in evidence of instrument not duly stamped...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35, Registration Act, 1908, Section 17(1)(b)-- Distinction - Where an instrument which is not registered may be admitted in evidence for collateral purposes - Whereas an instrument not duly stamped cannot be looked into for any purpose...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 33, 35-- Insufficiently stamped document - A document cannot be admitted in evidence as long as it remains an insufficiently stamped document - But at the same time Court has power to impound the document and once it is impounded it cannot be received in evidence and acted upon...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint u/s 138 of the Act - Complaint through power agent - Power of attorney admitted by principal - Signing by power agent in place earmarked for principal and principal signing in place earmarked for agent will not invalidate power of attorney - Moreover, by putting..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint u/s 138 of the Act - Complaint through power agent - Admittedly, cheque not issued on date of execution of power of attorney - Rather, power to institute complaint u/s 138 of the Act mentioned in power of attorney which was given earlier, will not lead to..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 35, Registration Act, 1908, Section 49-- Instrument not duly stamped is inadmissible in evidence - S.35 of Stamp Act is distinct and different from S.49 of Registration Act in regard to unregistered document - S.35 of Stamp Act does not contain a proviso as appended to S.49 for Registration Act enabling instrument to be used to establish..........

Showing : 31-40 of 106 Results