Showing : 91-100 of 110 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 26, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13- - Challenge in revision to blanket stay of execution of ex parte decree without imposing any terms and conditions on judgment - debtor in proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 for setting aside ex parte decree - Normally such order does not call for any interference by High Court - Fact that suit filed..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code-- Not applicable to execution of pre-emption decree for possession - Order 41 Rules 6 and 8 applicable in a case where any immovable property in execution of decree being sold - Suit for possession by way of pre-emption decreed, same upheld upto Supreme Court, in execution objections of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Execution - Stay during pendency of decision of application U.O.9.R.13 - Application for stay of execution dismissed - High Court stayed execution and directed trial Court to dispose of the application of petitioner to set aside ex parte decree within 3 months...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 41, Rule 19-- Application for recall of exparte order - During pendency of application execution proceedings of ex parte order initiated and executing Court issued `Parwana' for delivery of possession - Held, it is a fit case to stay execution of ex parte order till disposal of application for recall of ex..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - Stay of execution of decree - Valid award passed under the provisions of Forest Act - Civil Court set aside award on compromise between the owner of the land and the Conservator of Forest who had no authority from the State Government - State filing a suit for declaration..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136-- Execution - Limitation - When there is an appeal, period of limitation is to be reckoned from date of appellate decree and not from date of original decree - Decree against defendants 1 & 2 - Defendant No.1 preferred appeal - Held, even if 2nd defendant did not prefer appeal, execution petition..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136-- Execution - Limitation - Starting point -Period of limitation starts to run from the date on which appellate Court's decree was passed even if no stay of trial Court's decree was passed...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 144, 151-- Eviction order - Appeal - During pendency of hearing of stay application D.H. undertaking not to execute decree till hearing of stay application - J.D. dispossessed on same day in execution proceeding - J.D. ordered to be put back in possession by invoking powers under Section 151 CPC - Held,..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1(3), 5(5)-- Failure to make deposit or to furnish security - Court not to grant stay of execution of money decree...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Eviction petition - Compromise - Eviction decree passed - Tenant taking some persons as partners - Partnership firm claiming itself to be tenant - Held, there is no privity of contract between the firm and the landlord - Application U.O.39 Rr.1, 2 seeking stay of execution of eviction decree..........

Showing : 91-100 of 110 Results