Showing : 241-250 of 726 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Pleadings as to - Landlord specifically pleaded that he is not in possession of any other commercial site in urban area of Ferozepur Cantt and he has no other shop - Held, pleadings lead to conclusion that there was no occasion for him to vacate any other shop in..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304-- Part II Nature of offence - Accused convicted u/s 302 IPC - Single blow given with the instrument - Prosecution evidence not indicate that act was accomplished with pre-mediation or that appellant intended to commit murder or was knowing consciously that his act was so eminently dangerous that..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Trial - Petitioner/surety bailed out accused involved in offence u/s.138 - Failure of petitioner to produce accused before Court - Trial Court imposed penalty of Rs.25,000/- on petitioner - Appellate Court reduced penalty amount to Rs.15,000/- - Revision against - Held,..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code 1908, Section 96(2), Order 9, Rule 13-- Appeal against ex parte decree - Appellate Court cannot consider the question whether appellant was prevented by sufficient cause for not appearing in the trial on the day of trial - Appellant cannot urge any of the grounds which he could have rised in an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC...........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Cause of action - Complainant in his evidence had clearly asserted that he went to the office of -'B-' OP No. 5, first to collect the commercial invoice and subsequently to submit the same but after its verification he was advised by respondent/OP No. 5 to go to Mumbai -..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 46 days - No period of delay which is sought to be condoned mentioned in the application by the petitioners - Reasons mentioned by the petitioners are general, routine and extremely vague without any dates whatsoever - Such..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Wrong advice by counsel - Ignorance of law on the part of counsel - Mistake of counsel or ignorance of law on the part of counsel cannot be treated as sufficient cause for condoning the delay...........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Scope of O.9.R.13 CPC - Held, proceeding U.O.9.R.13 of the Code is not concerned with merits of the suit but is concerned only with two things, viz. summons were not duly served on defendant or that he was prevented for any sufficient cause from appearing when..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300-- Injury whether sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature is a question of fact which has to be determined in the light of facts and circumstances and evidence produced in a given case...........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 21(b)-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 289 days in filing appeal - Ground that free copy of the order not supplied by the District Forum as Xerox machine was out of order - On receipt of notice in execution petition petitioner came to know of the order and applied..........

Showing : 241-250 of 726 Results