Showing : 261-270 of 729 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Delay of three years - Condonation of delay - Mistake of clerk of counsel as he could not mark the case and counsel could not appear and case was dismissed for want of prosecution - Factum of dismissal came into notice of applicant on inspection of file..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Proof of - Held, determinative factor in S.300 of IPC is intentional injury, which must be sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature - It is immaterial whether offender had knowledge that an act of that kind will be likely to cause death - Offender's subjective knowledge of..........
HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - District Forum has passed the impugned order without appreciating the facts of the case - Held to be a fit case to condone the delay - Delay of 61 days in filing of the appeal condoned...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256-- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Setting aside - One singular default on the part of complainant on record - Sufficient cause for absence shown by complainant - Held, at least one more opportunity should have been given to complainant - Impugned order of dismissal in default set aside -..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Identification parade - Delay - Effect - Held, it is a settled position of law that test identification parade should be conducted as soon as possible after arrest of accused and this becomes necessary to eliminate possibility of accused being shown to witnesses prior to parade - It is also a..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Complaint - Limitation - Continuing cause of action - Airlines - Loss of baggage - Matter arisen from an incident of 17.7.1997 - Protracted correspondence between the appellant and respondents/OP starting with his letter 14.12.1998 and their reply of 27.4.1999 - Respondent paid for loss of baggage..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Complaint - Limitation - Continuing cause of action - Airlines - Loss of baggage - Matter arisen from an incident of 17.7.1997 - Protracted correspondence between the appellant and respondents/OP starting with his letter 14.12.1998 and their reply of 27.4.1999 - Respondent paid for loss of baggage..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Delay of 28 days in filing complaint - Condonation - Complainant being the only son of his father could not file the complaint in time as his father had suffered a fracture - Complainant is not required to explain delay of each and every day - It is sufficient if sufficient..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Bringing legal heirs on record - Condonation of delay - Averments contained in application ex-facie lack bona fide - Petitioners have failed to explain delay by showing sufficient cause - Held, it is true that approach of Courts should be liberal so far as applications filed u/s 5 of Limitation..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 692 days in filing revision - There is no explanation at all, as to after withdrawal of the writ petition on 29.9.2010, what prevented the petitioner for not filing the present revision petition till 3.2.2011 - There is no..........

Showing : 261-270 of 729 Results