Showing : 261-270 of 795 Results

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), S.96 - Delay in filing first appeal by Govt. - Condonation - Court has discretion to condone delay provided sufficient cause is shown - Government organization has its own administrative limitation with regard to movement of files - Necessary procedure as required under..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 18-- Incorporation of amendment - Extension of time - 2 days time granted - There was Advocate's strike on 28.02.2011, therefore, the order passed on 28.02.2011 granting 2 days more time could not come to the knowledge of counsel for plaintiff/appellant - Held, there was sufficient cause for not..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 11, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Non-substitution of LRs - Abatement of appeal - Application for substitution of LRs - Delay therein - Application for condonation of delay - No sufficient cause shown for delay - Held, delay cannot be condoned - Appeal abated for no, substitution of LRs...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Appeal - On account of legal advice appellant was prevented from filing the appeal in time - Held, explanation for the same is reasonable and bonafide - That differing legal advice could be a sufficient cause, in a given case and Appellant's conduct otherwise bonafide -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300,302,304-- Part II Culpable homicide - Evidence on record more than sufficient to indicate that accused had intention to cause such bodily injury that would in all likelihood would cause death of deceased in natural course of things - All conditions imposed by S.300 IPC fulfilled - Accused liable to be..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Pleadings as to - Landlord specifically pleaded that he is not in possession of any other commercial site in urban area of Ferozepur Cantt and he has no other shop - Held, pleadings lead to conclusion that there was no occasion for him to vacate any other shop in..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304-- Part II Nature of offence - Accused convicted u/s 302 IPC - Single blow given with the instrument - Prosecution evidence not indicate that act was accomplished with pre-mediation or that appellant intended to commit murder or was knowing consciously that his act was so eminently dangerous that..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Trial - Petitioner/surety bailed out accused involved in offence u/s.138 - Failure of petitioner to produce accused before Court - Trial Court imposed penalty of Rs.25,000/- on petitioner - Appellate Court reduced penalty amount to Rs.15,000/- - Revision against - Held,..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code 1908, Section 96(2), Order 9, Rule 13-- Appeal against ex parte decree - Appellate Court cannot consider the question whether appellant was prevented by sufficient cause for not appearing in the trial on the day of trial - Appellant cannot urge any of the grounds which he could have rised in an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1(3)-- Withdrawal of suit to file afresh suit - Permissibility - It is not pleaded that suit may fail by reason of some formal defect and no allegation was made to make out sufficient grounds for allowing plaintiff to withdraw suit with liberty to file fresh suit on same cause of action - It is seen from..........

Showing : 261-270 of 795 Results