Showing : 41-50 of 116 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 692 days in filing revision - There is no explanation at all, as to after withdrawal of the writ petition on 29.9.2010, what prevented the petitioner for not filing the present revision petition till 3.2.2011 - There is no..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 692 days in filing revision - There is no explanation at all, as to after withdrawal of the writ petition on 29.9.2010, what prevented the petitioner for not filing the present revision petition till 3.2.2011 - There is no..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 22, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal - Cross objections - Not filed within time - Condonation of delay - Court normally be inclined to condone the delay in the interest of justice unless and until the cross objector is unable to furnish a reasonable or sufficient cause for seeking leave of Court to file cross objections beyond..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 21(b)-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Petitioner proceeded ex parte before the District Forum - Copy of order dated 20th April, 2010 of the District Forum was received by the petitioner on 31st March, 2010 whereas appeal before the State Commission was filed after 103..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of 894 days - Condonation - Reason or cause stated about the illness and old age and also the fact that advocate had also expired resulting in a communication gap - Held, it is sufficient cause - Delay condoned...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9-- Delay - Condonation - Sufficient cause - To be construed liberally so as to advance substantial justice, when the delay is not on account any dilatory tactics, want of bona fides, deliberate inaction or negligence on the part of the appellant; (ii) In considering the reasons for condonation of..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 83 days in filing appeal before the State Commission - The only cause shown was that the file was moving from table to table - Rightly held to be not sufficient cause...........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15-- Appeal - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 188 days in filing appeal after the passing of the impugned order - Delay not properly explained - The application for condonation of delay dismissed...........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 24A, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Appeal condonation of delay - Delay of 281 days in filing the appeal - Only reason given that due to some unavoidable reasons the appeal was filed with delay - Not a sufficient cause when the Counsel for the appellants was present before the District Forum when the impugned order was passed -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay in filing appeal - Condonation - Fact that a case is good on merits constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay - Meritorious matter not to be dismissed at threshold - Delay of 447 days in filing appeal condoned as the same was good on merits...........

Showing : 41-50 of 116 Results