Showing : 181-190 of 317 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 11, Rule 12-- Discovery of documents - Power of Court - Exercise of - Held, power of court to direct other party to produce document at any time during pendency of suit cannot be questioned - But, before giving such direction, Court has to be satisfied that the document in question is relevant for proper..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 420, 120B-- Agreement to sell executed on 20.7.2006 - Subsequently another false agreement executed, purported to have been written on 4.4.2006, after purchasing stamp papers in the back date and by fabricating the documents and on the basis of such agreement sold the land on 19.12.2006, in order to defeat..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d)-- Rejection of plaint - Factors to be considered - Held, while considering application U.O.7.R.11(d) CPC, Court is required to consider averments in plaint and supporting documents produced along with plaint - However, it cannot be disputed that if on the face of it and even considering the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11-- Res judicata - Applicability of - There is no discussion or finding with regard to title of parties to schedule property, which is subject matter in present suits, either substantially or incidentally - Held, it cannot be said that since Court in earlier suit had considered all documents marked on..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 1-- Dishonour of cheque - Recovery suit - Documents placed on record would show that dispute is fully covered under the provisions of O.37 of CPC - Documents also leave no room for doubt that cheque issued by defendant stands dishonoured due to `Insufficient Funds' - In criminal complaint filed..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Agreement to sell-- Suit for specific performance - Suit can be filed on the basis of unregistered documents and also upon an oral agreement - Lack of notorisation or registration does not disentitle plaintiff to the relief...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Agreement to sell-- Suit for specific performance - Readiness and willingness - As per defendants they have not taken any amount from commission agent, but commission agent depicted huge outstanding amount from defendants and on that pretext, obtained signatures and thumb impressions on blank stamp papers, blank..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Contract Act, 1872, Section 126-- Bank guarantee - Equitable mortgage - Denied by defendants - Defendants contended that bank fabricated all the documents by utilizing the signed blank papers taken from them by the bank - Defendants admitted forwarding of title deeds but pleaded that those were only for scrutiny but for what..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2-- Bar to further suit - Applicability - Earlier suit filed by appellant for declaration and injunction - Execution of agreement of sale denied by respondent - Even after denial, appellant neither amended his plaint incorporating relief of specific performance nor filed separate suit - Held,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27-- Suit for specific performance - Additional evidence - No explanation why certified copy of alleged agreement was not produced by plaintiff at appropriate stage of his evidence - Said agreement was well within knowledge of present plaintiff while plaintiff was leading his evidence - Held, only..........

Showing : 181-190 of 317 Results