Showing : 241-250 of 285 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A-- Additional evidence - Demarcation report and Nakasha twafat got prepared by revenue authorities and report of Local Commissioner i.e. Field Kanungo, who was appointed by revenue authorities sought to be produced - Such evidence is subsequent to the institution of suit and is primarily based upon..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 1-- Summary suit - Suit for recovery - Defendant admitting receipt of goods and having made part payment - Objection as to quality or quantity not raised at the time of delivery - Reply not given by defendant to the letter of demand nor any objection to the documents submitted by the plaintiff - It..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100-- Second appeal - Concurrent findings of fact - High Court not to interfere except in cases where it is found that the Courts below ignored the weight of preponderating circumstances and allowed the judgments to be influenced by inconsequential matters, where the concurrent findings of facts are..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A-- Additional evidence sought to be produced certified copies of judgments which are public documents - Certified copies obtained well before the date on which suit filed - No reason forthcoming why these documents could not be produced at the time when plaintiff leading his evidence - Only..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A-- Additional evidence to produce certified copies of plaint, written statement and memo of issues in earlier suit to substantiate plea regarding suit being barred under Order 2 Rule 2 - Case at final stage of arguments - Documents within knowledge of party - No sufficient cause shown for not..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A-- Additional evidence - Documents sought to be produced in additional evidence at the arguments stage - No sufficient cause shown for not producing these documents at the earlier stage of the suit - Documents were within the knowledge of the applicant - Additional evidence cannot be allowed to be..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 31-- Registered documents - Cancellation - Simpliciter suit for declaration of title is not maintainable - Signatory to the document can only seek cancellation of the deed as contemplated under S.31 of the Specific Relief Act...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Agreement to sell-- Suit for specific performance - Property was subjected to equitable mortgage with Bank - Vendor did not disclose to plaintiff if there was any mortgage when they entered into the agreement to sell and paid purchase price - Plaintiffs are thus bona fide purchasers - Also, Bank staff had colluded..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment as party - A party who claims ownership in relation to subject - matter of suit and prima facie shows documents in support thereof - Should normally be treated to be a party whose presence before Court would be proper for settling controversy in suit - Merits of claims are of no..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Application for impleadment by Punjab Wakf Board claiming to be owner of property as per Central Gazette Notification and relying on judgment of Civil Court which held Punjab Wakf Board to be owner of these properties and further plaintiffs themselves moved applications to Wakf Board for allotment..........

Showing : 241-250 of 285 Results