Showing : 11-20 of 61 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(c)-- Sale deed - Challenge to - In case of no, executant, not in possession of suit property, prays for consequential relief of possession as well as suit for declaration, ad valorem Court fee has to be paid u/s 7(iv)(c) of Act - But in case of no, executant of sale deed, in possession of suit property..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(v)-- Court Fee - Suit for declaration, injunction & possession - Once additional and independent relief of possession is claimed then court fee has to be paid with respect to suit claiming relief of possession as per S.7(v) of Act by valuing the property as per the market value on the date of filing of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(b), Article 17(vi)-- Court fee - Suit for partition - Co-owners - Unless ouster is pleaded, co-owners would be deemed to be in joint possession of a joint property and in a suit seeking partition court fee of Rs.19.50 has to be affixed and not with reference to value of property with reference to share of parties to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(v), Constitution of India, 1950, Article 227-- Ad valorem court fee - Suit for joint possession of suit land alleging it to be coparcenary property of parties - Plaintiffs also challenged two transfer deeds executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendants Nos.2 and 3 regarding suit land - Plaintiffs are not party to transfer deeds which are..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(c)-- Court fee - Suit for partition - Plaintiff not in actual or construction possession - Court fee payable is ad valorem on market value of share of plaintiff in suit property and not on market value of entire suit property - Plaintiff cannot be directed to approach revenue authorities to determine..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(v)-- Court fee - Challenge to sale deeds to which plaintiffs were not party - Plaintiffs not liable to pay ad-valorem court fee on sale consideration - However, for relief of possession plaintiff are liable to pay court fee on ad-valorem value of suit land...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(iv)(a)-- Ad valorem court fee - Agricultural land - Suit for possession - Held, for relief of possession, plaintiff has to pay ad valorem court fee on 10 times of land revenue of suit land - Impugned order of trial court directing plaintiff to pay ad valorem court fee on actual market value of suit land is..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Suit for possession -- Licensee - Respondent put in possession as licensee being an employee of sister concern - Sister concern not a necessary and proper party - Legal notice dated 29th May, 2007, issued terminating licence - Respondent has no right to retain possession of suit property - Status of respondent was that..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7- - Court fee - Suit for declaration to be owners in possession by way of adverse possession and that defendants have no right, title or interest in the suit land and that various sale deeds and consequent mutations are null and void and relief of injunction also prayed - Plaintiff not being party to..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(v)(e)-- Court fee - Suit for mandatory injunction - Suit was not simpliciter suit for mandatory injunction but in fact it was for relief of recovery of possession and declaration - Suit is required to be valued properly at the market value of the property...........

Showing : 11-20 of 61 Results