Showing : 501-510 of 709 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 34-- Interest, capitalisation of - Suit for recovery of money - Principal sum, calculation of - Would be sum of actual loan plus amount of interest on periodical rests which according to contract between the parties or established banking practice, stood capitalised - Central Bank of India's case..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint u/s 138 as well as civil suit for recovery - Two proceedings are independent of each other - If Criminal Court levies fine on accused and orders payment of compensation out of amount of fine, then Civil Court can take that fact into account in moulding its award for..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Bahi entry-- Suit for recovery of money - A preponderance is in favour of the plaintiff that he advanced the money - Even if the thumb impressions could not be compared due to some technical defect and the execution of writing itself is not challenged, the suit can still be decreed for the reason of..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, Section 14, 4(6), 77(3)(n)-- Suit/application by mortgagee in possession for recovery of rent from mortgagor-landlords - Maintainable - Landlord-mortgagors liable to pay rent to mortgagee in either case that mortgagee had given land in rent to mortgagors and that is why they are in occupation of land despite the mortgage..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Complainant filed the present complaint against the respondent-bank on 27.4.1995 - Earlier on 14.6.1993, the respondent-bank filed a recovery suit against the complainant in the Debt Recovery Tribunal - Complainant also filed a civil suit against the bank on 16.7.1994 - Complainant..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27-- Plaint - Amendment at appellate stage - Suit for declaration of title and injunction - As plaintiff dispossessed during pendency of appeal as such relief of possession sought - Courts should try to avoid multiplicity of litigation - Amendment allowed - Appellate Court to invoke jurisdiction..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 47, Rule 1, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Section 18, 31-- Suit for recovery by bank - Civil Court passed decree when it had no jurisdiction to pass such decree in view of coming into force of Act of 1993 - Bank sought recalling entire suit proceedings including decree in view of fact that decree is inexecutable for want of jurisdiction to pass same -..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Plaint - Amendment - Suit for perpetual injunction - Amendment sought to seek relief of declaration and recovery of possession - Held, when a suit is filed initially for perpetual injunction, subsequent application for amendment seeking to convert suit into one for declaration of title is not..........
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CALCUTTA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Electricity connection-- Electric meter - Complainant applied for new electric meter as well as electric connection to his premises - Deposited security deposit service connection charge and cost of meter - Board taking no action - Forum directing Board to arrange for supply of electricity to the premises of complainant..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 7(1), 8-- Expln. (c) - Suit by wife against husband for recovery of movable properties alleged to have been taken away by husband - It is a suit between parties to marriage - Family Court alone has jurisdiction - Merely because husband's father is impleaded as party to suit, it cannot be said that Civil..........

Showing : 501-510 of 709 Results