LawMirror.com

Results of summoning

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 1101 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319 -- Summoning of additional accused - Applicants were named in FIR, however, they were not shown as accused in charge sheet - PW1, has specifically named applicants and specific role has been attributed to them - Statement of PW1 before Court can be said to be evidence during trial - Consequently on basis of said evidence..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of summoning order - Material available on record make out a prima facie case against accused at this stage - There appear to be sufficient ground for proceeding against accused - Pure questions of fact arises in the application which may be..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Petitioners are neither Managing Directors nor Authorized Signatories of accused company - No specific role has been attributed to petitioners, except for general allegation stating that petitioners were responsible for control and management and day to day affairs of accused..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B, 498A, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4 -- Summoning of additional accused - Dowry death - Main allegation is against husband and father-in-law of deceased supported by dying deceleration - However, no accusation against prospective accused in dying declaration - General allegation..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 17 -- Service of summons by affixation - Summoning of process server and witnesses not necessary in every case, wherever service takes place by affixation - Plaintiff himself could have produced said witnesses...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 210 -- FIR and complaint in same offence - Summoning of petitioners - Allegations against petitioners are verbatim the same both in FIR and in complaint - Complainant when filed complaint before Magistrate there is no reference to FIR in body of complaint except one person is cited as a witness to place on record said FIR - Even,..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 504, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 2(d) -- Offence u/ss 323, 504 IPC - Offences are bailable and non cognizable - Procedure of complaint case to be adopted - Order taking cognizance and summoning order quashed...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 143, 145 -- Dishonour of cheque - Defence plea of accused - Once summoning order is issued in the case, it is obligation of accused to take notice u/s 251 Cr.P.C, if not already taken and enter his/her plea of defence before concerned Metropolitan Magistrate's Court and make an application, if they want to recall any witness...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of complaint - Court does not find any material on record which can be stated to be of sterling and impeccable quality warranting invocation of jurisdiction of Court u/s 482 Cr.P.C at stage of summoning of accused - Moreover, defence as raised by..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Dishonour of cheque - Additional evidence - Belated stage - Additional evidence sought to be produced and proved after final hearing of the case - Plea that it is not proper or permissible to recall a prosecution witness after final hearing of the case - There is no illegality in..........

Showing : 1-10 of 1101 Results