Showing : 801-810 of 829 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1989
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125, 66-- Maintenance petition - Husband a Govt., servant - Service of summons - Proof of - Onus of proof - Notice sent as provided under section 66 of the Code but directly by registered post - Notice received back with endorsement `Refusal' - By itself no proof of refusal - Rival party is to prove refusal..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1988
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 50(1)(c), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 30, Rule 6, 7, 8-- Scope-Decree against a firm and its Managing Director - decree holder applied for arrest of Managing Director - Managing Director objecting that he was neither a party nor summons were served on him individually-objection upheld by execution Court not sustainable...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1988
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 2, 10-- Exparte proceedings - setting aside - plea that neither a copy of summons nor a copy of plaint given-application opposed by the other party - the proper procedure in such cases is to give an opportunity to the applicant to lead evidence and then right of rebuttal to the other party and then to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 19-A-- Exparte ejectment order - Setting aside - Service of summons - Process servers report that on refusal to accept summons he affixed a copy of the same on the premises in dispute - Not sufficient service as summons by registered post as envisaged by O.5 R.19-A not sent - Exparte ejectment order set..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Proviso & O.5.R.19-A - Exparte decree - Setting aside - Substituted service - Summons not served by registered post despite specific Court order - Not a mere irregularity within the meaning of Proviso to O.9. R.13 CPC...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 19-A-- Service of summons - By ordinary post as well as by registered post-both the modes are to be resorted to...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 20-- Service of summons-despite specific Court order summons not sent by registered post - substituted service - not valid as there could not be any valid satisfaction of the Court that the defendant could not be served in the ordinary way...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 19A, 20(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Non-compliance with specific order of Court for issue of summons by registered post also - Not a mere irregularity - Incumbent under Rule 19-A to issue summons by both modes prescribed for service i. e. ordinary process as also service by registered post - If no specific order of Court for issue..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3, 2-- Evidence closed as three official witnesses failing to appear inspite of service of summons - Whether proper ? (No.)..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1-- Dusti summons for the service of witnesses - party not requesting for dasti summons - Court of its own directing the plaintiff to take out dasti process - wholly an unwarranted procedure - so far non-service of the witnesses the petitioner could not be held responsible nor his evidence closed...........

Showing : 801-810 of 829 Results