Showing : 31-40 of 254 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test identification parade (TIP) - Where accused persons are apprehended at the instance of complainant or complainant immediately on their apprehension identifies them, a TIP conducted is an idle formality and not the requirement of investigation...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 397, 34-- Test identification parade (TIP) - Robbery - Complainant identified the accused on verification, TIP was thus meaningless, as TIP is an aid in investigation and is required to be conducted if facts and circumstances so demand...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test Identification parade (TIP) - Murder case - TIP of accused not conducted - Incident occurred in open field, where 150-160 villagers were present at the time of incident - It was thus, necessary for police to conduct TIP - Non-conducting of TIP by police caused prejudice to accused and creates..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test Identification parade (TIP) - Not substantive evidence - Conviction cannot be based solely on the identity of accused by witness in TIP...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 396, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Dacoity with murder - Test Identification Parade (TIP) - 22-25 dacoits were involved in the incident - It was a day light incident - Except TIP no other evidence adduced by prosecution - No evidence on record that only surviving accused had covered his face or not during committing dacoity and..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test Identification parade (TIP) - Substantive evidence is the evidence of identification in Court and TIP at the most provide corroboration to identification by witness in Court...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 394, 323, 341-- Robbery - Identification of accused - Not held in Court - Even no steps were taken by prosecution to prove the fact of identification of accused and co-accused by complainant in test identification parade - Magistrate who held the parade was also not produced as witness during trial - It cannot be..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Test identification report in jail is not a substantive piece of evidence but it can only be used as corroborative evidence and could not be of much evidentiary value...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Dacoity - Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Accused convicted only on the basis of TIP - TIP was held after two months of incident, but delay was not explained - More so, TIP held in jail, which is not substantive piece of evidence - Moreover, accused were known to witnesses - Neither injury was..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307-- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Attempt to murder - TIP held after 6 months of occurrence - Delay in conducting TIP not explained by prosecution - No reliance placed upon evidence of TIP - However, PW1 being an injured witness, clearly identified the accused - Evidence of PW1 and other evidence..........

Showing : 31-40 of 254 Results