Showing : 121-130 of 387 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Theft of vehicle - Damages - Depreciation - Policy document itself has specified that deduction for depreciation @ 5% will have to be made in respect of motor cars between the age of 6 months and 1 year - Plea of the petitioner - complainant that since the vehicle was stolen within a period of 12..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 126, 127, 135, 53-- Theft of energy or unauthorized use of electricity - Electricity Board was taking an action for recovery of Rs.39,400/- and demanding sum to be paid within 15 days - Held, petitioner was entitled to assume that Electricity Board was treating case as an order of assessment u/s.126 and was justified..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Electricity Act, 2003, Section 152-- Electricity theft - Compounding of offence - Penalty - Admitted on behalf the petitioner that no notice for compounding offence had been issued - Obviously the Respondent did not have the opportunity to apply for compounding of the same - Findings by the Fora below concluding that the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Electricity Act, 2003, Section 152-- Electricity theft - Compounding of offence - Penalty - Admitted on behalf the petitioner that no notice for compounding offence had been issued - Obviously the Respondent did not have the opportunity to apply for compounding of the same - Findings by the Fora below concluding that the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Theft of mobiles - Repudiation - On the ground that there was element of force or violence not present in the case - Held that when the lock of the godown was found on the street and that the culprit was convicted by Criminal Court u/s 454 IPC it may be gathered that element of force was present..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Theft of mobiles - Repudiation - On the ground that there was element of force or violence not present in the case - Held that when the lock of the godown was found on the street and that the culprit was convicted by Criminal Court u/s 454 IPC it may be gathered that element of force was present..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 378-- Theft - Possession - Meaning of - Held, 'possession' is a polymorphous term which may have different meanings in different contexts - 'Possession' implies physical capacity to deal with thing as possessor likes to exclusion of every one and a determination to exercise that physical power on his..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 378-- Theft - Nature of 'possession' referred in S.378 of IPC - Held, S.378 of IPC defines 'theft' as dishonest removal of movable property out of possession of any person without consent of that person - Standing timber being embedded in earth is immovable property - Moment it is severed from earth it..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Electricity connection-- Tampering of meter - Theft of energy - In terms of circular No. 10 of 2001 respondent did not inform the consumer about the date, time and place for checking of meter - Plea that when the meter was removed wife of the appellant was present and she was told to remain present in the ME Lab at the..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Theft of truck - Driver was drunk and was found in an inebriated state as per medical report - He did not remove the keys from the ignition socket - The driver did not take reasonable care as postulated in Clause 5 of the Insurance Agreement - Respondent - Insurance Company cannot be..........

Showing : 121-130 of 387 Results