Showing : 171-180 of 370 Results

ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Insurance claim - Occurrence of theft on 17.3.1994 - Repudiation of claim on 24.3.1997 - Complaint filed on 2.12.1997 - Held to be within period of limitation...........
ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Insurance claim-- Deficiency in service - OP No. 2 - Bank soon after the theft intimated the Insurance Company about such occurrence of theft - After two years of theft the Insurance Company sent the claim form and requested form certain documents which were remitted by OP without any delay - OP No. 1 held liable..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Insurance claim-- Theft of vehicle - Breach of trust - Once the police have registered the case u/s 379 IPC the loss shall come within the definition of theft - The question of breach of trust by party will not affect the right of the person, who lost the vehicle...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 145, 126-- Bar of Civil Court jurisdiction - Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from demanding any amount under the garb of allegations of theft of energy - Held, such kind of dispute does not fall within the purview of S.126 of the Act and therefore jurisdiction of civil court is not..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity-- Theft - Electricity rules require that to prove the theft of electricity it is the basic requirement that the meter must have been checked from the concerned laboratory...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 39(1), 44(1)(c)-- Theft of electricity by company - Prosecution of directors of company - In absence of pleading and proof that such Directors were incharge and/or were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company, such Directors cannot be convicted...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 39(1), 44(1)(c)-- Theft of electricity by company - Prosecution of directors of company - There should be requisite averments in the complaint and also it is to be proved that the Directors prosecuted were incharge of and otherwise responsible for the conduct or the affairs of the Company - Only on proof that such..........
THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity supply-- Excess load - Electricity theft - Penalty - Connected load to the extent of 8.776 KW as against the sanctioned load of 1.8 KW - Complainant was giving energy illegally to two persons from his meter which was burnt, thus dead stop - He was also running a Toka machine - The FIR for the above said..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 24-- Theft of electricity - Neither notice is required to be given nor reference to Electrical Inspector is necessary...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 24-- (As amended by Haryana Amendment Act, 1998) - Theft of electricity - Nigam imposing fine - Consumer filing civil suit challenging the penalty - Matter remitted to High Court to decide as to whether civil suit is maintainable...........

Showing : 171-180 of 370 Results