Showing : 191-200 of 387 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity-- Theft - Electricity rules require that to prove the theft of electricity it is the basic requirement that the meter must have been checked from the concerned laboratory...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 39(1), 44(1)(c)-- Theft of electricity by company - Prosecution of directors of company - There should be requisite averments in the complaint and also it is to be proved that the Directors prosecuted were incharge of and otherwise responsible for the conduct or the affairs of the Company - Only on proof that such..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 39(1), 44(1)(c)-- Theft of electricity by company - Prosecution of directors of company - In absence of pleading and proof that such Directors were incharge and/or were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company, such Directors cannot be convicted...........
THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity supply-- Excess load - Electricity theft - Penalty - Connected load to the extent of 8.776 KW as against the sanctioned load of 1.8 KW - Complainant was giving energy illegally to two persons from his meter which was burnt, thus dead stop - He was also running a Toka machine - The FIR for the above said..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 24-- Theft of electricity - Neither notice is required to be given nor reference to Electrical Inspector is necessary...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 24-- (As amended by Haryana Amendment Act, 1998) - Theft of electricity - Nigam imposing fine - Consumer filing civil suit challenging the penalty - Matter remitted to High Court to decide as to whether civil suit is maintainable...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity disconnection-- Electricity theft - On checking alleged tampering of the meter, broken seals etc. found - The department official did not send the meter to M&T Laboratory to pin point the actual defect in the working of the meter to support their findings - Complainant has been paying bill for 45 years without..........
THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electrical energy-- Theft of electric energy - Electricity bill - Penalty - Connection of the complainant found running slow by 5.15% during inspection by the Additional Superintending Engineer - Notice for an amount of Rs. 9613/ - issued to the complainant which was duly paid by him without any protest - Meter was..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 39, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Quashing of FIR - Penalty imposed for tampering with seals of electricity meter - Penalty amount deposited - FIR lodged for theft of electricity - FIR quashed - As penalty has already been deposited thus continuance of criminal proceedings is nothing but an abuse of the process of law - FIR and..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 94-- Forcible possession of vehicle - Stolen property - Search - Petitioner has purported to invoke clause 8.2 of loa, cum-hypothecation agreement for taking possession of vehicle in question on ground that second respondent committed defaults in re-payment of loan - Petitioner is a financier who..........

Showing : 191-200 of 387 Results