Showing : 51-60 of 388 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 379, 302.149, 201, 411-- Abduction and murder of seven persons - Theft of 700 sheeps - Nothing incriminating recovered from possession of five accused persons - No independent witness supported prosecution case - Only evidence against these accused persons was either their own confession or confession of co-accused, which..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 379, 302.149, 201, 411-- Abduction and murder of seven persons - Theft of 700 sheeps - Accused `K' was arrested along with 700 sheeps and some other animals and accused `P' was arrested at the instance of accused `K'- Property of seven deceased persons were also recovered from accused `K' - Accused `K' not claimed..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 379, 302.149, 201, 411-- Abduction and murder of seven persons - Theft of 700 sheeps - Recovery of dead bodies - Accused `P' was arrested at the instance of accused `K'- Seven dead bodies of persons recovered at the instance of accused `P' from the well - It is not the case of accused `P' that he had seen someone else..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, 118-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Legally enforceable debt - As per evidence on record, it appears that defence of accused is that cheque in question was stolen, which is palpably false - Even, DW-1 stated that cheque found missing and it is discerned only after a day - Story of accused, that he..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, 118-- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Legally enforceable debt - As per evidence on record, accused could not prove to contrary, the presumption that cheque issued by accused in discharge of legally enforceable debt - Even, plea of theft of signed cheque proved false - Accused could not rebut..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 151-- Theft of electricity - Cognizance of offence - S.151 of Act does not control or put a ban on the power of police to investigate a cognizable offence under Cr.P.C...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135-- Theft of electricity - Limitation - Punishment provided exceeds one year but not exceeds three years - Period of limitation is three years - Complaint is not barred by limitation as same is filed within three years from the date of quashing of earlier proceedings with liberty to file a fresh..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 451-- Theft of seized property - Where seized property is stolen, lost or destroyed and there is no prima facie defence made out that State or its officers had taken due care and caution to protect the property, Magistrate may in an appropriate case, where the ends of justice so require, order payment..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused allegedly demanded a sum of Rs.2000/- from complainant for replacement of transformer but the deal settled for a sum of Rs.1000/- - No specific evidence on record to prove said fact - There were 10/12 persons present at the time when money was given to accused but..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135(1)(e)-- Unauthorized use of electricity - Unauthorized use is one of the items of theft contained u/s 135(i)(e) - In other words, unauthorized use is a manner of commission of theft...........

Showing : 51-60 of 388 Results