Showing : 81-90 of 191 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 112, Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act, 1956, Section 11, Will-- Proof of - Suspicious circumstances - Attester and scribe of will does not say that will was drafted to the dictation and information of executor - As per their evidence executor having understood the contents affixed his thumb impression - Deceased was suffering from asthma - Nothing on record to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consent decree-- Passed on the basis of family settlement - Statement of defendant recorded in Court - Challenged on the ground of fraud and misrepresentation - Statement made in Court cannot be said to be obtained by fraud or misrepresentation or by using blank paper bearing thumb impression of defendant - Plea..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consent decree-- Challenged on the ground of fraud, misrepresentation and undue influence - Allegation of fraud, misrepresentation and undue influence must be clearly pleaded and then proved by clear and cogent evidence - Family settlement arrived at between the family members in the presence of relatives - Held,..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Expert opinion - Thumb impression - Sale deed of the year 1991 and filed in Court in the year 1994 - Comparison of thumb impression sought 16 years of date of sale deed - Question in controversy whether thumb impression on sale deed is forged or not - Since there is delay of 16 years therefore..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45, Order 26, Rule 10-A-- Expert evidence - Recovery suit based on promissory note - Defendant branded promissory note as forged and fabricated document and specifically denied signature or thumb impression there on - Held, defendant should get opportunity to send document to hand writing expert for compassion of disputed..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304-- Culpable homicide - Accused husband attacked victim, grabbed her and tried to kill by striking her with a razor - Statement of victim consistent on assault and secured corroboration from the statements of her lawyer and his clerk, who were post occurrence witnesses - According to doctor, if the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Thumb impression - Comparison by handwriting expert - Document not properly stamped - Stamp duty and penalty paid and document exhibited - Opposite party seeking comparison of thumb impression by an expert - Cannot be said that application is filed to drag on the proceedings as in absence of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consent decree-- Passed on the basis of admission in written statement - Statement of defendant not recorded - By itself not a circumstance to uphold the plea of fraud - Written statement verified by one defendant and even that thumb impression was forged and thus there was no verification of written statement at..........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES UEDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Contract Act, 1872, Section 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material facts - Disease of COPD - Death of deceased within two months of taking the insurance policy with accidental benefit - Appellant failed to prove the fact that the deceased was a patient of COPD prior to filling in up the declaration form..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Suspicious circumstances - Will cannot be discarded merely on the ground that it has been thumb marked and not signed by the testator as testator had affixed his thumb impression even on the earlier Will though testator had signed on certain documents which reveal that he was a semi literate..........

Showing : 81-90 of 191 Results