Showing : 1-10 of 13 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- Taking of cognizance - Barred by limitation - Effect on State - Lapse of time does not bar rights of State...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Delay in lodging complaint - Condonation of delay - While taking cognizance reasons justifying condonation of delay not stated - Held, while entertaining time barred complaint, Court is required to consider complainant's request in the light of his/her statement on oath and..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(b)-- Dishonour of cheque - Summoning order - Quashing of - There is no reference of demand notice dated 07.05.2002 in complaint - Only a photostat copy of said notice has been filed by revisionist - Only reference of second notice dated 21.08.2002 has been mentioned in complaint - Held, complainant..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190, 202, 203-- Time barred complaint - Magistrate should satisfy himself on the point of limitation at pre-cognizance stage...........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Delay - Condonation - Accused is not entitled to hearing before Court considers taking cognizance of time barred complaint for dishonour of cheque...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 2(h), 468, 470-- Investigation by police - Effect of lapse of time - Petitioner alleged to have committed an offence u/s 379 IPC - After being released on bail, accused absconding inspite of non bailable warrants and proceedings ultimately culminated into the order declaring him proclaimed offender u/ss 82 and 83..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- Cognizance of offence by Magistrate u/ss 341 and 294 of IPC on a complaint - Alleged occurrence took place on 1.9.2002 - Complaint filed on 10.6.2004 - Period of limitation prescribed u/s 468 (2) Cr.P.C. is period of one year from the date of occurrence - Held, time barred cognizance bad in law -..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341, 294-- Cognizance of offence by Magistrate u/ss 341 and 294 of IPC on a complaint - Alleged occurrence took place on 1.9.2002 - Complaint filed on 10.6.2004 - Period of limitation prescribed u/s 468 (2) Cr.P.C. is period of one year from the date of occurrence - Held, time barred cognizance bad in law -..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468, 473-- Period of limitation - Extension of time - Procedural requirements - Non-compliance of - Prosecution itself admitted that cognizance taken by Magistrate is barred by limitation and Magistrate also not invoked provision of S.473 of the Code - Held, condonation of delay should precede taking of..........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Time barred complaint - Unless Court condones delay in making complaint, cognizance of offence cannot be taken - Accused to be heard before delay is condoned - Impugned order taking cognizance set aside and matter remanded...........

Showing : 1-10 of 13 Results