Showing : 71-74 of 74 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation proceedings-- Are not judicial proceedings - They do not decide title nor it is evidence of exclusion from property...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42, 23A, 18, 2(bb)-- Bachat land, redistribution of amongst proprietors hasab rasad raqba khewat-Plea that Director Consolidation could not decide question of title-Not tenable as Director Consolidation did not decide question of title because title in Bachat land inheres in proprietors of the village-Mutation of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1986
Details
Mutation entries-- Do not confer title to the land - Title is derived from the sale deed properly stamped and registered...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1986
Details
U P Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, Section 5(6), 5(1)-- Expln.I - As amended by Act No.1 of 1972 w.e.f. 24.1.1971 - Land held `ostensibly in the name of any other person' - Burden of proof that the land held by that person in his own right lies on that person - Tenure-holder alienated land by registered sale deed in favour of his sons and..........

Showing : 71-74 of 74 Results