Showing : 71-80 of 91 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 41-- Title of vendor - When vendor has only partial interest in the property and disposed of property greater than what he really has - Vendee is to establish and prove that he took reasonable care and made full enquiry about the title of the property purchased - Mutation entry in the name of the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Correction of entries showing land in ownership of Gram Panchayat to that of Khewatdars - For Gram Panchayat in the first instance to prove that land vests in it on account of the provisions of Section 2(g) Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act-Onus would thereafter shift to the opposite..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Khewatdars (proprietors) filed petition under Section 42 against re-partition and prayed for partition of land owned by proprietary body but wrongly shown as Shamilat Deh- Land shown in revenue records as Shamilat Patti Hasab Pamana Hakiat, mutated in favour of Gram Panchayat in 1955 and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation-- Held, mutation entries do not create any title or interest therein - These entries are only one of the modes of proof of the enjoyment of the property - Mutation entries are only to enable the State to collect revenues from the persons in possession and enjoyment of the property and that the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation-- Mutation of a property in the revenue record does not create or extinguish title nor has it any presumptive value on title - It only enables the person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue in question...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation-- Mutation of a property in the revenue record does not create or extinguish title nor has it any presumptive value on title - It only enables the person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue in question...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation proceedings-- Are not judicial proceedings - They do not decide title nor it is evidence of exclusion from property...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42, 23A, 18, 2(bb)-- Bachat land, redistribution of amongst proprietors hasab rasad raqba khewat-Plea that Director Consolidation could not decide question of title-Not tenable as Director Consolidation did not decide question of title because title in Bachat land inheres in proprietors of the village-Mutation of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1986
Details
U P Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, Section 5(6), 5(1)-- Expln.I - As amended by Act No.1 of 1972 w.e.f. 24.1.1971 - Land held `ostensibly in the name of any other person' - Burden of proof that the land held by that person in his own right lies on that person - Tenure-holder alienated land by registered sale deed in favour of his sons and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1986
Details
Mutation entries-- Do not confer title to the land - Title is derived from the sale deed properly stamped and registered...........

Showing : 71-80 of 91 Results