Showing : 61-70 of 74 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Mutation-- Mere mutation entry or change in any mutation entry does not confer any title to any immovable property..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Limitation, Article 58,113-- Plaintiff seeking declaration of title in property and defendant denying plaintiff's title - Suit under Section 34 Specific Relief Act - There can be no right to sue until there is accrual of right asserted in the suit and its infringement or at least a clear and unequivocal threat to infringe..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 14-- Owner of land died in 1950 - Mutation sanctioned in favour of widow - Widow got the lands mutated in names of appellants in 1954 - Widow claiming to be absolute owner of suit property after coming into force of the Act - She executed four separate gift deeds in favour of appellants - Reversioners..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Mutation-- Mutation entries do not convey or extinguish any title - Those entries are relevant only for purpose of collection of land revenue...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 41-- Title of vendor - When vendor has only partial interest in the property and disposed of property greater than what he really has - Vendee is to establish and prove that he took reasonable care and made full enquiry about the title of the property purchased - Mutation entry in the name of the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Correction of entries showing land in ownership of Gram Panchayat to that of Khewatdars - For Gram Panchayat in the first instance to prove that land vests in it on account of the provisions of Section 2(g) Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act-Onus would thereafter shift to the opposite..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42-- Khewatdars (proprietors) filed petition under Section 42 against re-partition and prayed for partition of land owned by proprietary body but wrongly shown as Shamilat Deh- Land shown in revenue records as Shamilat Patti Hasab Pamana Hakiat, mutated in favour of Gram Panchayat in 1955 and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation-- Held, mutation entries do not create any title or interest therein - These entries are only one of the modes of proof of the enjoyment of the property - Mutation entries are only to enable the State to collect revenues from the persons in possession and enjoyment of the property and that the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation-- Mutation of a property in the revenue record does not create or extinguish title nor has it any presumptive value on title - It only enables the person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue in question...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Mutation-- Mutation of a property in the revenue record does not create or extinguish title nor has it any presumptive value on title - It only enables the person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue in question...........

Showing : 61-70 of 74 Results