Showing : 161-170 of 181 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15,52,57-- Search and seizure - Recovery of two bags containing 40 kgs of poppy husk each loaded on mare; accused catching the string of the mare - Conviction and sentence - Accused alleging violation of the provisions of Sections 52 and 57 of the Act with regard to identification of case property as no FIR..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Criminal trial-- Three accused - Conviction - Appeal by two - Conviction based solely on evidence of identification - Evidence of identification found not reliable to sustain conviction - Case of third accused who had not appealed was not distinguished - His conviction also liable to be set aside...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376-- Rape - Conviction by trial Court and acquittal by High Court - Delay of 26 hours in lodging FIR fully explained - Accused 18 years of age fully capable of doing inter course - The two grounds for acquittal by High Court viz non examination of other independent evidence and minor contradictions in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Conviction of appellant u/s 302 IPC and acquittal of seven others - Contention that High Court when did not rely upon eye witnesses in material particulars while acquitting seven other accused, appellant could not be convicted - Maxim 'falsus in uno falsus in omnibus' not a sound rule to apply in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18-- Opium - Four samples each 50 grams from each of four packets drawn but samples received in FSL were 33.1, 33.5, 33.5 and 35.8 grams - There was non compliance of S.55 of the Act as Malkhana Incharge did not state that samples were affixed seal of SHO also besides seal of seizing officer - Two..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 149, 333, 149, 452, 149, 427, 149, 148-- Conviction - Procession by mob in protest against the death of a person of weaker Section of society in police custody - A part of procession attacked a bye stander who ran towards the police van and members of the police party then ran in that direction to rescue that man - At that stage some..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 149-- Murder - Conviction - Appreciation of evidence - Two witness theory - Conviction of 18 persons for offences u/S.302 and 302/149 on the testimony of two PWs - Accused Nos. 9, 10 and 12 identified by only one witness - Held that considering the large number of people involved, it would be prudent in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder of 35 persons in caste war - Murder by unlawful assembly of large number of persons - Conviction of eight of them - Conviction can be based on evidence of one eye witness only - It is only a rule of caution that where there are large number of offenders and large number of victims it would..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 471-- Company - Managing Director of the Company convicted under S.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act - A case under Ss.420, 471, 467 IPC also registered against the Managing Director and two Directors of the accused company on the ground that they forged a receipt of Rs.40 lacs in token of having made..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 325, 149, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 464-- Charge framed u/s 302 against six accused - Two accused convicted u/ss 304 Part II and 325 respectively - Others convicted for offence punishable under S.325 read with S.149 - No charge framed u/s 149 - Plea that conviction without framing of charge u/s 149 is illegal - Not tenable - Prosecution..........

Showing : 161-170 of 181 Results