LawMirror.com

Results of 395 ipc

Showing : 61-70 of 96 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 411, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 240 -- Dacoity - Charge framed u/s 395 IPC - Accused acquitted u/s 395 IPC but convicted u/s 411 IPC as stolen goods were recovered at their instance - Conviction u/s 411 IPC set aside as no charge was framed u/s 411 IPC - Accused could not be convicted without framing the charge - Moreover..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395 -- Dacoity - Sentence - Dacoity is a daredevil act - Most of the time, a serious crime like dacoity is committed by unknown persons and it is very difficult to trace them and still difficult to secure their conviction - Looking to the nature of crime and the manner in which the appellants looted temple properties, graver punishment was..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 376(2)(g), 458 -- Dacoity and gang rape - Prosecution allegations that 8 persons with muffled faces broke open the house, attacked complainant with deadly weapons, committed rape on two female members and looted property - Delay of 6 months in sending finger prints lifted from spot for comparison not explained - Eye witnesses not asked..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395 -- Dacoity - Informant and his brother coming on motor cycle, were accosted by five accused - One of accused fired shot causing injury and they rook away motor cycle - Only two were named in FIR - Their names were disclosed by informant - Other three never put to Identification Parade - Occurrence took place in night - Informant and his..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395 -- Accused convicted for offence of dacoity - Rs.2, 860/- in cash, one lotta, and one glass constituted articles of loot - Accused persons faced agony of protracted trial of 28 years and are now of old age - No allegation of any injury alleged to have been caused by any of the accused - Sentence awarded by the High Court reduced to 3..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 397, Arms Act, 1959, Section 3, 25 -- Dacoity - Proof of - Prosecution allegation that accused entered house of complainant and looted articles - Prosecution witnesses identified accused - Looted articles recovered from accused and identified by complainant - Recovery memo and arrest memo proved by witnesses - Desi 12 bore katta..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397, 202, 203, 204, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 397 -- Summoning order - Police report that no occurrence of dacoity took place - Case not appearing to be probable - Complainant had also filed some other complaints against some of the accused persons - Case appears to have been filed to harass his opponents - Judicial..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395 -- Dacoity - Proof - Dacoity in the house of informant - Informant stated in the F.I.R. that all the dacoits had covered their faces with 'Gamchha' - During trial in the court he stated that he identified two accused persons when 'Gamchha' covering their face fell down - Such information not revealed to the investigation officer -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395 -- Reduction of sentence - Incident fifteen years old - Held, that in a serious case of dacoity no leniency in sentence is desirable and the passage of time cannot wash away gravity of offence...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 120B -- Bail - Offence u/ss 302, 395 & 120-B IPC - Bail declined - However granted after 20 days - High Court cancelled bail as there was no change of circumstances - Trial pending for long - Sessions Judge directed to complete trial within 3 months - If trial is delayed beyond 3 months..........

Showing : 61-70 of 96 Results