LawMirror.com

Results of undue influence fraud

Showing : 71-80 of 94 Results

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Insurance claim -- Discharge voucher - Scooter - Accident - Claim settled at Rs.9715/- against repair bill of Rs.12,933.02P - Complainant received Rs. 9715 from the OP towards full and final discharge of his claim - No fraud, coercion or undue influence etc. alleged much less proved by complainant - District Forum rightly dismissed the complaint...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 102, 103, 111 -- Fraud, mis-representation or undue influence - Burden of proof - When so alleged by an illiterate widow women who is in a fiduciary relationship with another and the latter is in a position of active confidence, the burden of proving absence of fraud, mis-representation and undue influence upon the person in a dominating..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Insurance claim -- Discharge voucher - Case investigated and settled - Respondent gave a voucher on 28.8.1991 in full and final settlement of his claim - Payment received on 1.9.1991 without any protest or demur - On 14.9.1991, complainant wrote letter to the petitioner saying that he was forced to give voucher in full and final settlement of the claim - The protest lodged..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- To confer jurisdiction on High Court under S.100 CPC a substantial question of law is sine qua non - High Court interfered with fact finding entered by First Appellate Court on question of undue influence, fraud etc. in execution of sale deed - Trial Court dismissed but lst appellate Court decreed the suit - No substantial..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Hindu Law -- Partition - Re-opening - Principles governing (1) It can be re-opened if it is obtained by fraud, coercion, misrepresentation or undue influence (2) When there are minor coparceners it is binding on minors also if it is done in good faith and on bona fide manner keeping into account the interests of the minors (3) When there are minors and partition is unjust..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1999
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3, 3-A -- Expression 'lawful agreement or compromise' in Rule 3 - By lawful, it means not contrary to law, public policy or void ab initio or unlawful - Cannot include grounds like fraud, undue influence, coercion, by which decree can be avoided, treating it as voidable - Till it is avoided and displaced - Can be treated as lawful..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1999
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(g), 14 -- Complaint after accepting claim amount in full and final settlement - Mere execution of discharge voucher would not always deprive consumer from preferring claim with respect to deficiency in service or consequential benefit - If consumer satisfies the authority under the act that discharge voucher was obtained by fraud,..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1999
Details

Will -- Exclusion of daughters - Will made in favour of wife and sons - Attestators and witnesses to Will deposing that testator was in sound state of mind at the time of execution of Will - No undue influence, fraud or coercion shown - Mere exclusion of daughter from inheritance does not create doubt regrading genuineness of Will...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1998
Details

Hindu Law -- Coparcenary property - Alienation by father - Sale deed executed in favour of one of his daughters and son-in-law - Plea of son that it was obtained by undue influence and fraud and that it is without consideration - Burden lies heavily on son to establish the said plea - Son failed to discharge the said burden - Son and other daughters admittedly never looked..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1998
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 4 -- Suit challenging compromise recorded by LPA Bench - Nothing to show that compromise arrived at before LPA Bench was outcome of fraud, coercion, undue influence or any misrepresentation or LPA Bench recording compromise had no jurisdiction - Separate suit not maintainable...........

Showing : 71-80 of 94 Results