LawMirror.com

Results of unfair o

Showing : 231-240 of 411 Results

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) , 14(1)(d) -- Unfair trade practice - Punitive damages - Mobile scheme - The scheme or so - called contest in question comes within the ambit of lottery inasmuch as several lacs out of two crores subscribers who have made calls for more than 20 minutes duration a day are eligible to take part in it - Out of them a lot is drawn..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Victimisation, unfair labour practice - Tribunal will interfere when there is want of good faith, victimisation, unfair labour practice etc. on the part of management - Workman is entitled to raise contentions like unfair labour practice as also acts of victimisation on the part of management - Such a contention has to be..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11A -- Code of conduct - Management and workman - Whereas management cannot resort to victimisation and unfair labour practice so as to get rid of the union leaders, workman in turn are bound to maintain discipline - A workman indulging in commission of a criminal offence should not be spared only because he happens to be a union..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION. SHIMLA-9

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) , 14(1)(d) -- Education - Distance Education - Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Punitive damages - Respondent No. 1 was authorised study centre for Himachal Pradesh of respondent No.2 University - Advertisement given for admission for M.Phil but no prior recognition obtained from competent authority - Appellant bought..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) -- Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Cement - Purchase of 112 bags of cement in December, 2003 which was manufactured in September, 2002 - The manufacturer OP No.1 would certainly be liable for unfair trade practice as by then the strength of the cement has reduced by atleast 40% as per the guidelines - Payment of Rs. 1..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Section 18 -- Auction of plots by Govt. body - Reserve price not disclosed in public notice and at the time of auction - Held, not unfair...........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION. SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) -- Unfair trade practice - Insurance claim - Consent - Held that consent obtained presupposes that all formalities were completed and it was only thereafter that the consent was obtained by surveyor - Otherwise it not only tantamounts to laying of a trap, but also is an unfair trade practice being adopted on behalf of the..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) , 14(1)(d) -- Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Scooter - Average of scooter found to be 44 kms. as against 74 as represented - Compensation of Rs. 3,000/ - held to be on the lower side and enhanced to Rs. 15,000/ - ...........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) -- Unfair trade practice - Insurance policy - Policy matured after lapse of 12 years for which complainant had paid annual instalment of Rs. 10,000/ - for 12 years - When period of payment of annuity came LIC came with plea that they had committed calculation mistake and issued wrong policy - Altogether new police issued after..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Relief of specific performance cannot be granted if it would give unfair advantage to the plaintiff and where performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant, which he did not foresee - Discretion of Court is not exercised to grant specific performance if the contract is not equal and fair, although the..........

Showing : 231-240 of 411 Results