LawMirror.com

Results of unfair o

Showing : 81-90 of 411 Results

THE UNION TERRITORY CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 15 -- Unfair trade practice - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Motor vehicle - Selling of vehicle used for demonstration as brand new vehicle - Findings of the District Forum that it tantamount to deficiency in service and indulgence into unfair trade practice upheld and appeal liable to be dismissed...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 2(r) -- Plot - Auction purchase - Consumer - Consumer dispute - Plea that dispute would not fall within the purview of a 'consumer dispute' in terms of Section 2(1)(e) of the CP Act nor would the respondent qualify as a 'consumer' under the definition of Section 2(1)(d) of the Act repelled - Grievance of the..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 2(r) -- Plot - Auction purchase - Consumer - Consumer dispute - Plea that dispute would not fall within the purview of a 'consumer dispute' in terms of Section 2(1)(e) of the CP Act nor would the respondent qualify as a 'consumer' under the definition of Section 2(1)(d) of the Act repelled - Grievance of the..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 12 -- Witness - Non appearance - Witness failed to appear before court - Procedure to be followed thereafter - Held, court can take action against such witness - Court cannot force witness to make any statement against his will - Direction of Sub-ordinate Court to advocate of plaintiff to file examination in chief on affidavit..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 300 -- Exception 4 - Undue advantage - The number of wounds is not the criteria on which undue advantage has to be determined - However, the position of accused and the deceased with regard to the arms used, the manner of combat are good empirical facts wherefrom the Court can determine whether accused took undue advantage - Indeed undue..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313 -- Rape and murder - Incriminating circumstance against accused - Putting of - Object of - Held, object behind S.313 Cr.P.C. is to enable accused to explain any circumstance appearing against him - This object is based on maxim audi-alteram partem which is one of the constituents of principles of natural justice - It has always..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHHATTISGARH

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Education Unfair trade practice - Fees - No refund of fees - Respondent attended class of OP - appellant only for two months when she got admission somewhere else - She requested OP No. 1 to give Transfer Certificate and Migration Certificate but she was not given till she deposited remaining amount..........

CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Education Unfair trade practice - Fees - No refund of fees - Respondent attended class of OP - appellant only for two months when she got admission somewhere else - She requested OP No. 1 to give Transfer Certificate and Migration Certificate but she was not given till she deposited remaining amount..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Education - Unfair trade practice - Fees refund - Compensation - Respondent joined Course with the petitioner and petitioner took fees for two years at the beginning - In view of judgment of Apex Court in Islamic Academy of Education case the petitioners were wrong in demanding fees ab initio for entire two..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d) -- Education - Unfair trade practice - Fees refund - Compensation - Respondent joined Course with the petitioner and petitioner took fees for two years at the beginning - In view of judgment of Apex Court in Islamic Academy of Education case the petitioners were wrong in demanding fees ab initio for entire two..........

Showing : 81-90 of 411 Results