LawMirror.com

Results of uttarakhand

Showing : 1-10 of 14 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7 -- Ex parte order - Setting aside - Defendant/State of U.P though was tardy and could not ensure timely appearance, yet when concerned officials were made aware of pendency of suit and ex parte order, prompt steps were taken - Even plaintiff sought an adjournments at least on two occasions - In such circumstances, it cannot be..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960, Section 10 -- Asami of land - Occupancy rights - Name of predecessor-i, interest of plaintiffs was deleted from possession over land in question on the report of Record Operation Officials, as his name was surreptitiously recorded - Statue conferred benefit on a person recorded as occupant - Predecessor-i,..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960, Section 10 -- Occupancy rights - Asami of land - Entry made by Patwari in Khata Khatauni - Validity - Patwari was not authorized to enter name of any person or confer any right - Entry made by Patwari as is clear from entry itself, was not in consequent to any order passed by any competent officer - High Court..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Service -- Re-organization of State of U.P into Two States i.e State of U.P and State of Uttrakhand - Services of appellants were transferred and absorbed by State of Uttrakhand on their choices with mutual consent of both the States - Since then appellants continuing as employees of State of Uttarakhand - There is no infirmity in procedure adopted by both the States in..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Uttarakhand Police Act, 2007, Section 42, 78, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Police reform - PIL - Condition of police personnel - In the instant case, it is established that normal working hours of subordinate police officer ranged between 10 to 16 hours per day, seven days a week and due to said working hours health problems occurring amongst them - Hence,..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Service -- Recruitments of teachers - Qualification - Two notifications were issued by National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) - Claim of similarity - Issue as to candidates covered under which notification - Appellants contended that they may be treated at par with those similarly placed candidates who approached the Rajasthan and Uttarakhand High Courts - No reason..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 243C, Uttarakhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2016, Section 18(4), Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904, Section 9 -- No confidence motion against Pradhan - Notice period - In the instant case, 15 days notice given to Pradhan - In absence of use of term `at least' 15 days u/s 18(4) of the Act, only date on which notice is given has to be..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 147 -- Dishonour of cheque - Compounding of offence - Dispute amicably settled by parties - Complainant not interested in prosecuting accused and thus, permitted to compound the offence - Conviction and sentence passed against accused set aside, subject to deposit of 15% of cheque amount with Uttarakhand State Legal Services..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Stamp Act, 1899, Section 28, 47A -- Article 5(b1) of Schedule 1B (As in Uttarakhand) - Agreement to sell - Registration - Stamp duty - Stamp duty is payable on 50% of the value of consideration of the sale agreement...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Stamp Act, 1899, Section 28, 47A -- Article 5(b-1) of Schedule 1B (As in Uttarakhand)- Agreement to sell - Registration - Stamp duty - Recovery of deficient stamp duty - Agreement to sell cancelled within two months of the execution thereof - Held, subsequent conduct of the parties in cancelling the agreement not a reason for not taking action u/ss 33 & 38 of the Act...........

Showing : 1-10 of 14 Results