Showing : 11-20 of 53 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3, 3A-- Compromise decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Denial of signatures by defendant on the vakalatnama and compromise as summons were not issued to him - Burden was on plaintiff to prove that compromise as well as vakalatnama was genuine - Since no evidence has been adduced in this..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9-- Restoration of suit dismissed for default - An advocate can file restoration petition though vakalatnama does not expressly authorise him to file an application for restoration, if Court is satisfied that there was no express prohibition in doing so, it has to assume that counsel had implied..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Report of process server that defendants are not residing at the given address - After five days Vakalatnama was filed by an Advocate followed by written statement where virtually admissions were made and finally a family settlement deed - Court compared the..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952, Rule 431- - Petition - Petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. can be filed even on basis of instructions given by client (memo of appearance) and there is no compulsion to file vakalatnama on behalf of litigant in such case as per rules of 1952...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1-- Withdrawal of suit at appellate stage - Dismissal of suit on merits as well non signing of plaint and vakalatnama by plaintiff Nos.3 & 4 - Defect of not signing plaint could be cured in accordance with law - Since the suit was decided on merits as such appellate court gravely erred in permitting..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4-- Counsel - Duly authorized by the party to appear by executing Vakalatnama - Counsel is empowered to continue with the proceedings and also to withdraw the proceedings or compromise the proceedings on instructions from the party...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-- Compromise - Signed by counsel on behalf of defendants No.2 to 6 - Vakalatnama in favour of Advocate reveals that Advocate was authorized to effect compromise also on behalf of the defendants - Compromise is a lawful compromise - Held, compromise is a valid compromise...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Application for setting aside abatement - Condonation of delay - Application filed by applicants for bringing them on record as heirs and LRs of deceased appellant after a period of 11 years - Proposed LRs No.3(a) has signed the affidavit in English - A bare perusal of Vakalatnama signed by..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Defendant not served with summons in suit - Their address in suit was also not correct - Defendants had no knowledge about pendency of suit - However, Advocate appeared on behalf of defendant by filing memo of appearance - Plea of defendants that they had never..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151-- Additional evidence - Documents sought to be produced by way of additional evidence are certified copies of appeal and vakalatnama and also written statement and power of attorney - Photo copies of the said documents have been produced in Court - Thus, application for leading additional evidence..........

Showing : 11-20 of 53 Results