Showing : 21-30 of 53 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4-- Counsel duly authorised by Vakalatnama - Counsel is empowered to continue on record until the proceedings in the suit are duly terminated - Counsel, therefore has power to make statement on instructions from the party to withdraw appeal...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 122, Rule of, 27(1)-- Civil Practice, - Attestation of vakalatnama - Notice was issued by Family Court that litigants and their counsel have to appear before Sheristadar for executing and attesting vakalath - validity of - Held, as per R.27 vakalath executed by litigant had to be accepted if same is in conformity with..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-- Compromise decree - Setting aside of - Partition suit decreed - In first appeal decree modified on the basis of compromise between parties - Defendant No.1 filed cross appeal challenging correctness of decision of appellate Court on the ground that compromise neither recorded by appellate Court..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 6-- Advocate appearing on behalf of defendant did not file Vakalatnama inspite of repeated adjournments - Defence struck off - Held, if Advocate did not file power of attorney then at the most Court can proceed against defendant considering him to be absent in the case - But Court cannot struck off..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 6-- Advocate appearing on behalf of defendant did not file Vakalatnama inspite of repeated adjournments - Defence struck off - Order set aside - Court can impose costs when inspite of direction power of attorney is not filed...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Professional misconduct-- It is bounden duty of an Advocate to accept the copy which is served upon him - An Advocate has no business to refuse to accept an application when he has filed his Vakalatnama - Such type of delaying tactics of judicial process and placing impediment in the dispensation of justice amounts to..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Power of attorney holder - Complaint - Singing of complaint and Vakalatnama - Complainant has been permitted to continue with proceedings through her constituted attorney holder `S' - Held, there was no necessity of permitting complainant to put her signature on petition of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - `Memorandum of Appearance' filed by Advocate for one date - Thereafter Advocate neither appearing on behalf of defendants nor filing Vakalatnama - Held, mere appearance of Advocate on behalf of defendants on one date of hearing by presenting `Memorandum of..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(1)-- Restoration application - Application filed on oral instructions, subsequently backed by signed vakalatnama - Held, application maintainable as there was sufficient compliance of O.3.R.4(1) CPC...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100-- Second appeal - Advocate for the respondents did not appear as his client had died and he had not filed vakalatnama on behalf of the legal heirs - Second appeal was allowed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the respondent - Impugned order set aside - Matter remanded back for decision..........

Showing : 21-30 of 53 Results