Showing : 31-40 of 53 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Advocates Act, 1961, Section 34-- Change of counsel - Contract of vakalatnama can be withdrawn by client at any time and if the client has lost his confidence and faith in the advocate, he can terminate the vakalatnama and seek return of the file...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, 29, 3-- Vakalatnama - Defective vakalatnama is liable to be returned - Defects routinely found in Vakalatnamas are : (a) Failure to mention the name/s of the person/s executing the Vakalatnama, and leaving the relevant column blank; (b) Failure to disclose the name, designation or authority of the person..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 241-- Plea of guilt - Conviction - Legality - Summons were ordered to be issued to accused on same date when charge-sheet was filed - Accused persons remained present on same date, filed their vakalatnama and court recorded their plea, wherein they pleaded guilty and impugned order was also passed on..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13-- Practice and procedure - State Commission comparing the signature of the appellant as appearing on the agreement with the admitted signature available in his pleadings and Vakalatnama - Nothing illegal - A Consumer Commission need not always be bound by strict rules of pleadings - Procedure before..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3, 4-- Legal representatives - Impleading of - Application filed by Advocate representing the deceased - Mere non filing of Vakalatnama simultaneously with the application does not render the application incompetent as Vakalatnama can be filed thereafter too...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(1)-- Appeal - Omission to sign memorandum of appeal or omission to file vakalatnama - Defect is curable - If and when the defect is noticed or pointed out, the Court should, either on an application by the appellant or suo motu permit the appellant to rectify the defect by either signing the memorandum..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consent decree-- Challenged on grounds of fraud and impersonation - Set aside on following grounds - - (i) Summons for service of defendant sent on wrong address, not served upon her. (ii) Advocate alleged to have appeared on behalf of defendant, well acquainted with plaintiff and his father. (iii) Statement of..........
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(c),13-- Complaint - Pleadings - Signing of by Advocate - Complainant has given authority to the Advocate to file the complaint by way of Vakalatnama - It was not an improperly filed complaint...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-- `In writing' & `signed by the parties' - Counsel possessed of requisite authorization by vakalatnama, can act on behalf of his client - The words `by parties' refer not only to parties in person, but their attorney holder or duly authorized pleaders - Statements recorded by Court amount to a..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(2)-- Explanation (c) - Appeal - Vakalatnama - Appeal filed by same pleader who appeared in the trial court - Fresh vakalatnama need not be filed - In such an event, a mere memo referring to the authority given to him in the trial Court is sufficient...........

Showing : 31-40 of 53 Results